SAFC Takeover Latest

[Banks]

If registering a new company with the SoL as a registered office isn't a hint as wide as the Channel that completion is close, I don't know what is.

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

 

[Heaton_mackem]

It's the equivalent of the old Annual Return. It will simply show changes in share capital (if any), changes in shareholders (if any) and changes in persons with significant control (control of 75% or more of shares). It's a routine document and has to be filed even if it's a nil return. If everything's gone through, it might give some hints as to what the deal was, but it's pretty much irrelevant given the the number of other filings that will be required on completion.

It's 25% or more for a PSC. So if the confirmation is due for the relevant company it should reveal whether or not SD (Madrox) retains at least 25% or not.

 

[SAFC_Jack]

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

Not sure you can just change/create info on Companies House “for a laugh” - plus, Mags are thick as fuck and still use dial up internet.

 

[Banks]

Not sure you can just change/create info on Companies House “for a laugh” - plus, Mags are thick as fuck and still use dial up internet.

Apparently it's quite easy and cheap to do. I'm not finance expert though

 

[Bacchus]

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

A few people?

 

[nandos sonic sauce]

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

I would hazard a guess that identity theft would raise a slight issue

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

The filing was done electronically by a large, and very expensive, firm of lawyers in London. There will have been supporting documents with it that don't get shown, including the directors' consent to act. Spoofing them would constitute forgery, and we'd have heard all about it by now if that was the case.

 

[Scootsie]

Without doubting its happening, taking a lot longer than expected, longer than when Donald or Quinn bought us, you wonder what the hold up is

No one even knew about the Donald takeover though, so we don’t know how long it actually took.

 

[Carteron]

I've noticed a confirmation statement is due by 29th September on companies house.

Anyone know what that means?

It's due in 2020. Just the annual return where they scam you for 13 quid to tell them you still exist on the same terms.

 

[Banks]

The filing was done electronically by a large, and very expensive, firm of lawyers in London. There will have been supporting documents with it that don't get shown, including the directors' consent to act. Spoofing them would constitute forgery, and we'd have heard all about it by now if that was the case.

That insider knowledge or is it on the paperwork

 

[pinewaves1868]

As bad as we were, are or will be will always be, have been and will be better in every possible way that our neighbours. But, but the champions League, Milan, etc., etc. That's without any takeover so let's all chill the fuck out.

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

No one even knew about the Donald takeover though, so we don’t know how long it actually took.

Madrox was formed about three weeks before the announcement.

 

[lawe toppa]

No they haven’t. Get a clue.

So they havnt formed a new company at companies house?

 

[BumbleBee]

Private Plane by Thomas Leer. A late 70s electro pop classic. Christ I love that record. I’ve lain by pools repeat playing it on my iPod ten or twelve times in a row.

Not my taste.

Now this - couldn't watch it more than twice in a row mind;

You must be logged on to see media items

 

[one gary owers]

It is considering reiver was expecting it done a few fridays ago

He never actually said a date Said in his opinion it may be is a lot different than giving a date
But your one of the twisty ones
I now know why others don't like you

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

That insider knowledge or is it on the paperwork

The lawyers' name is on parts of the filing.

 

[PhilSAFC]

So they havnt formed a new company at companies house?

Oh ffs.

 

[Heaton_mackem]

But you’re companies address isn’t the SOL is it?

It could be. Companies House don't check you're at the address registered and nothing is required to be submitted (using a code sent on the post) for 1 year.

 

[ca8msm]

I've heard a few people saying it could be mags on a wind up. I don't think it is.

Would it be possible though? Is there anything stopping people doing this?

No not possible. They would have had to forge legal documents with the directors names on them for a start.

 

[cluffy]

Private Plane by Thomas Leer. A late 70s electro pop classic. Christ I love that record. I’ve lain by pools repeat playing it on my iPod ten or twelve times in a row.

Cheers. Never heard of him or the track but I like it a lot on first listen. Sort of Fad Gadgetish? He’s not the best singer but that is good music!