• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

SAFC Takeover Latest

Status
Not open for further replies.
🤭 The Cronic's gone into melt down with every f***ing writer trying to put a negative spin on every article..:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: it's f***ing great.
Is that your comment posing as horsepuncher? :lol::lol:

 

Am I right in thinking that even if they wanted to, they can't really pump money in at league one level?

FFP and lack of revenue being a big issue.

So they will help out however they can but until we get promoted their hands are tied?
 
Am I right in thinking that even if they wanted to, they can't really pump money in at league one level?

FFP and lack of revenue being a big issue.

So they will help out however they can but until we get promoted their hands are tied?
They could sponsor the club, that's filed under earnings, so would allow us to spend a bit more.
 
Am I right in thinking that even if they wanted to, they can't really pump money in at league one level?

FFP and lack of revenue being a big issue.

So they will help out however they can but until we get promoted their hands are tied?

Actually at league one level they could pump in half a billion if they wanted as long as it was not in the form of a loan.


FL Turnover figure includes donations from the owners to the club and injections of equity. Loans from club owners are understandably not included. In League 1 and League 2, a wealthy owner can therefore fund the club spending in a way that is not permitted in other divisions. Manchester City and Leicester for example seem set for punishment for their excessive losses (from UEFA and the Championship respectively) despite the fact that the owners have injected hard cash into the club to finance the spending.
 
Last edited:
I like how there is a quote in the article with no induction of who it is attributed to. Also starts with a double quote mark and ends with single quote mark.
Made me smile the photo they've used for every article, must have been the worse one they could find, sums up the pathetic way these scummy fuckers go on.
 
I didn't take much notice TBH but Reiver posted something between him and another NEW member, that's still there, but ended up with a ban .. nothing I've read or seen seems to warrant that but its down to mods who don't give anyone on this board a reason or allow people to put things right.
Link please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top