Jeans economics

Status
Not open for further replies.


Levis 502s. Someone will be along in a minute to say £80 is too much to spend on jeans.

I have previously had Nudie (absolutely shite) and Edwin (took them back, shite).
 
Levis 502s. Someone will be along in a minute to say £80 is too much to spend on jeans.

I have previously had Nudie (absolutely shite) and Edwin (took them back, shite).

Yes,and I get that,but sometimes you can pay £30 three times as the quality runs out,when £70 once would have been good enough. These days,when nothing is made to last and everything is throwaway,people don't realise the plain economics of it.
 
Aye but quality doesn't always relate to price or a brand name.

Stopped being into brands when I was 13...

Levis are quality though mate.....expensive compared to the cheaper alternatives I know,but,I wouldn't go for the cheaper option. Mind you,I'm acutely aware not everybody can afford to choose.
 
Yes,and I get that,but sometimes you can pay £30 three times as the quality runs out,when £70 once would have been good enough. These days,when nothing is made to last and everything is throwaway,people don't realise the plain economics of it.

I'm not sure why you're trying to convince me.
Whatever happened to geordie jeans?

The pool was too narrow and they dyed out.
 
The world would be odd if jeans were never invented
 
Neither, unless you're talking about Levi's Vintage selvedge or Levi's Made and Crafted selvedge and even then you'd be better paying a bit more for some decent jeans elsewhere.

Most Levi's are tat these day.
 
Last edited:
Levis 502s. Someone will be along in a minute to say £80 is too much to spend on jeans.

I have previously had Nudie (absolutely shite) and Edwin (took them back, shite).

Probably not enough if you want long lasting hard wearning jeans.

Gustin / Naked & Famous / Momotaro / 3Sixteen etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top