smoker
Striker
Watched it again, it wasn't that sharp, and was a carbon copy of the previous delivery which he middled. He played down the wrong line.
-
The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
CC: Leicestershire v Durham
- Thread starter The Red Telephone
- Start date
- Status
Watched it again, it wasn't that sharp, and was a carbon copy of the previous delivery which he middled. He played down the wrong line.
smoker
Striker
Same old story, 3 wickets for the price of 1. Dig in man.
Burnham, Clark and Trevaskis doesn't fill you with any confidence.
Clark has done nothing to warrant his continued selection and Trevaskis should not be batting above Raine or Eckersley for me.
Burnham, Clark and Trevaskis doesn't fill you with any confidence.
Clark has done nothing to warrant his continued selection and Trevaskis should not be batting above Raine or Eckersley for me.
Last edited:
mackembhoy
Striker
Problem is do Richardson and Poynter come in and do anything different.
Mind you'd like to think they are desperate to have a chance to change their fortunes.
What's the craic with both Steels? Obviously Cameron out of sorts, but do they not fancy trying Scott after a promising performance with the bat in the List A stuff.
Last edited:
Monument View
Striker
Clark lucky to be still in
Missed by millimetre
Missed by millimetre
smoker
Striker
IIRC Poynter can't play unless Bangers is injured as he's now classed as an overseas player.
Richardson was in great form in the RLC (unlike Clark who was shocking), surely deserves a run. Adds some experience.
Maybe my opinion of ‘sharp’ is different to yours. Will you agree that it didn’t travel on the same line it had come from?
I tend to agree, but I wouldn’t move either of Eckersley or Raine up the order - it’s more that we haven’t got anyone more suitable to bat in that position, than those lads are batting too low down.
Last edited:
smoker
Striker
It did, but not sharply and was a carbon copy of the previous ball which he middled, like I said. IIRC he re-marked his mark between deliveries.
I don't have any beef with Burnham but thought that was a poor dismissal.
Monument View
Striker
On my stream the score is 309 for 2 with Rimmington 70 and Harte 15
mackembhoy
Striker
Oh yeah ECB doing their level best to make Ireland uncompetitive so they can steal the next Morgan
Even though I imagine this is part of the ICC's ruling to allow Ireland test status. Any excuse to knock the ECB
Bri
Striker
Can I have your stream then? It's better than mine.On my stream the score is 309 for 2 with Rimmington 70 and Harte 15
Bri
Striker
Oh yeah ECB doing their level best to make Ireland uncompetitive so they can steal the next Morgan
Even though I imagine this is part of the ICC's ruling to allow Ireland test status. Any excuse to knock the ECB
I'd suppose Ireland having Test status is within the scope of the ICC. But number of overseas I'd guess was part of the 'rules of the competition' which would be under the control of the ECB. Not that I'm complaining, it is what it is. It's all a bit strange.
Poynter is British, born and brought up in London but counts as Irish because he played a Test and because of the ICC and ECB rules. This application seems odd. You could say he has more right to play than Archer or Jennings. Not that it matters much, except to Poynter because he misses out.
Monument View
Striker
Daft attempt at a run
Bri
Striker
Bloody hell. There's plenty time in this game, no need to push it.
smoker
Striker
Absolutely pointless run out when Clark was just getting settled. Trevaskis seemed to call it, he's been involved in a few run outs.
Oh yeah ECB doing their level best to make Ireland uncompetitive so they can steal the next Morgan
Even though I imagine this is part of the ICC's ruling to allow Ireland test status. Any excuse to knock the ECB
Just checked: ruling comes into place this September, so he can play, but presumably has no future at Durham after that.
Last edited:
- Status
