• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover in trouble

Status
Not open for further replies.

skullmeister said:
I wouldn't post it. Are agents the most trustworthy of people and hasn't Gordon Armstrong been slagging the club off at every opportunity.
Click to expand...

It’s not Gordon or anyone else connected with him or his agency.

No there are some who aren’t always trustworthy, but when it’s someone I’ve known a while why would they lie to me?
 
homeless kid said:
Put your tampons back in man

You fannies

The deal was never a make or break thing it is a "nice to have" thing

Fuckin some of youse need to chill out we'll go up next season nowt the matter

Some of youse need to go for an induction up the road, you'd fit right in with them lot with a bed sheet and a bouycoutt and a horse's mouth to hit

Am I wrang?
Click to expand...

We desperately need investment
 
Last edited:
hank williams said:
At last

Some one else who can read on here

Amount of times I've had to correct posters on here that it wasn't a take over was unreal
Click to expand...

If they were buying a controlling stake in the club then it is a takeover.

I think that’s where people are getting confused - there was so much paper talk saying they were looking to take a 74% stake iirc

*edit*

Seems this has since been covered
 
Last edited:
Grumpy Old Man said:
I've actually said nothing of the sort. I was simply asked to do something I couldn't. I've seen nothing of substance.
Click to expand...
I obviously wasn’t clear. I wasn’t implying you had. It was me just guessing (as I stated), I was mainly basing in on you saying that you were ethically compromised by whatever the lad was alleging.
 
The Albanian said:
If they were buying a controlling stake in the club then it is a takeover.

I think that’s where people are getting confused - there was so much paper talk saying they were looking to take a 74% stake iirc
Click to expand...

People tend to think that a takeover means acquiring 100% of the shares, although with private companies that is usually the case. The real number, as you obviously know, is 50%+1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top