The Red Telephone
Striker
Highest 6th wicket stand for Durham before Eckersley went.
282 beating the 278 from last year between Richardson and Poynter.
282 beating the 278 from last year between Richardson and Poynter.
-
The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
CC: Sussex vs Durham
- Thread starter The Red Telephone
- Start date
- Status
Bancroft out now, to an absolute vile delivery.
Comfortably missing leg too - another case of umpires triggering the sandpaper man.
372-7.
Lunch at 13:10 today.
Collapse is on...... Here’s the Durham we know
283-8.
384-9. Part time spinner Rawlins has 3-19
Mind it is turning...... Trev, fill your boots lad.
It’s criminal how small our total will be here mind. When you consider two blokes scored 276 between them
384 all out from 372-5, fuck off man. When you think things are looking up, perhaps we’ve even turned a corner
Despite two partnerships of 282 and 64 - the rest could only muster 38-8. f***ing twatful.
Comfortably missing leg too - another case of umpires triggering the sandpaper man.
372-7.
Lunch at 13:10 today.
Collapse is on...... Here’s the Durham we know
283-8.
384-9. Part time spinner Rawlins has 3-19
Mind it is turning...... Trev, fill your boots lad.
It’s criminal how small our total will be here mind. When you consider two blokes scored 276 between them
384 all out from 372-5, fuck off man. When you think things are looking up, perhaps we’ve even turned a corner
Despite two partnerships of 282 and 64 - the rest could only muster 38-8. f***ing twatful.
Last edited:
The Red Telephone
Striker
To once again use Jesus of Middlesbrough's favourite phrase- 'It's never dull with Durham!!'.
.
869 minutes total batting time in the first innings...of which 695 minutes were from two batsmen.
#Durham
#Durham
GordonMuchallNo1Fan
Striker
Nobody does batting collapses like Durham
Monument View
Striker
Excellent start
2-3 now!
Monument View
Striker
We did have them if my memory is correct about 70 for 7 at our place
So we shouldn’t get carried away but good luck to the lads
So we shouldn’t get carried away but good luck to the lads
Bri
Striker
Nope, but it's also arguable that taken RLC and CC together Bancroft has at least equalled his effort of last year, and maybe more to come.
Not putting Latham down, he did well and looked good too. I was disappointed he didn't sign on again.
van Zyl nailed on for 50.
van Zyl b Harte 34
89-5.
Tea: 96-5.
Brown c Rushworth b Carse 26. 96-6
Jordan c Bancroft b Carse 6 - 110-7.
van Zyl b Harte 34
89-5.
Tea: 96-5.
Brown c Rushworth b Carse 26. 96-6
Jordan c Bancroft b Carse 6 - 110-7.
Last edited:
- Status
