‘The real story of the takeover’

Status
Not open for further replies.


It is a bit dodgy like, they are only here for one thing lets be honest and have barely spent a penny of their own money

Not sure Short had this in mind when he wiped the debt like, a quick flip and profit.

Using the clubs own money to pay short isnt great like

Expect them to be backed to the hilt as usual though.

JAR7391 said:
Nothing new in that story. Was common knowledge Short was going to get the parachute money this season.
Click to expand...

Not common knowledge that he has only put forward £5m of his own money like

hudson88 said:
Thought this was fairly common knowledge?
Click to expand...

What not using his own money to buy the club?
 
Last edited:
"No regulations will have been breached and no laws would have been broken. But two men who seduced Sunderland’s fans with their long-term vision for ‘a family club’ would return to their own family homes in Oxfordshire significantly richer"

They could have also gone home a bit poorer if we'd had another absolutely shit season. That's the way business investment works, it's a bit of a gamble. Especially on summat as distressed as SAFC was. If they do go home with a few quid I wouldn't begrudge them it, unless they hived us off to another absolute fucktard like Short.
 
The Mail causing trouble just before our biggest game of the season.

Whatever their financial position, our owners have worked for and with us and have done more for the club in working to turn it around than the disengaged regime they took over from.

I am happy with them and if they do leave and it benefits them I would still expect them not to asset strip but to leave us in a healthier position than when they took over.
 
Paddy O'Dors said:
"No regulations will have been breached and no laws would have been broken. But two men who seduced Sunderland’s fans with their long-term vision for ‘a family club’ would return to their own family homes in Oxfordshire significantly richer"

They could have also gone home a bit poorer if we'd had another absolutely shit season. That's the way business investment works, it's a bit of a gamble. Especially on summat as distressed as SAFC was. If they do go home with a few quid I wouldn't begrudge them it, unless they hived us off to another absolute fucktard like Short.
Click to expand...

If he makes 37 million after spending as little as he has then its sly as fuck like. They are being made out to be heroes, and I am not sure why
 
roker beach said:
The Mail causing trouble just before our biggest game of the season.

Whatever their financial position, our owners have worked for and with us and have done more for the club in working to turn it around than the disengaged regime they took over from.

I am happy with them and if they do leave and it benefits them I would still expect them not to asset strip but to leave us in a healthier position than when they took over.
Click to expand...


There is no sane person can say they have done more than Short like, he paid off over £100 million quid ma
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top