• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Ashwin mankands Buttler

Status
Not open for further replies.

The stigma associated with mankading needs to go away.

Now agreed, this specific instance ashwin found a loophole in the way the laws are written and took advantage of buttler’s inattentiveness, but in most cases mankading can’t even occur unless the batsman has been trying to cheat

These calls of ‘you gotta warn the batsman’ are, quite frankly, stupid. Do you have an obligation to warn the thief who steals into your house the first time you see him? Or are you going to punch them in the mouth at earliest opportunity ?
 
The stigma associated with mankading needs to go away.

Now agreed, this specific instance ashwin found a loophole in the way the laws are written and took advantage of buttler’s inattentiveness, but in most cases mankading can’t even occur unless the batsman has been trying to cheat

These calls of ‘you gotta warn the batsman’ are, quite frankly, stupid. Do you have an obligation to warn the thief who steals into your house the first time you see him? Or are you going to punch them in the mouth at earliest opportunity ?

It’s cricket man not getting your house broken into
 
The stigma associated with mankading needs to go away.

Now agreed, this specific instance ashwin found a loophole in the way the laws are written and took advantage of buttler’s inattentiveness, but in most cases mankading can’t even occur unless the batsman has been trying to cheat

These calls of ‘you gotta warn the batsman’ are, quite frankly, stupid. Do you have an obligation to warn the thief who steals into your house the first time you see him? Or are you going to punch them in the mouth at earliest opportunity ?
Agree with this.

Last over of a very tight game, 9 wickets down, batting side need 2 or 3 to win. Batsman steals yards and helps side win game. Won’t even end up being discussed.

Same scenario but bowler mankads batsman stealing yards and all hell would break loose.

As you say this instance with butler was harsh but even if he had been trying to gain a yard it would’ve been a similar outcryas apparently ‘it’s just not cricket’ :rolleyes:
 
Agree with this.

Last over of a very tight game, 9 wickets down, batting side need 2 or 3 to win. Batsman steals yards and helps side win game. Won’t even end up being discussed.

Same scenario but bowler mankads batsman stealing yards and all hell would break loose.

As you say this instance with butler was harsh but even if he had been trying to gain a yard it would’ve been a similar outcryas apparently ‘it’s just not cricket’ :rolleyes:

Can see you doing it

Nasty piece of work you .....
 
It’s cricket man not getting your house broken into

So why is everyone getting so worked up over it then?

Clearly people think a bowler enforcing the rules is somehow comparable to immoral behavior deserving international outcry. In that case, why is a batsman attempting to blatantly cheat not comparable to theft?
 
So why is everyone getting so worked up over it then?

Clearly people think a bowler enforcing the rules is somehow comparable to immoral behavior deserving international outcry. In that case, why is a batsman attempting to blatantly cheat not comparable to theft?

He wasn’t attempting to blatantly cheat the bowlers action in stopping is the contentious issue
 
He wasn’t attempting to blatantly cheat the bowlers action in stopping is the contentious issue

Oh, I wasn’t talking about this specific one. Agree that ashwin has stretched the rules to take advantage of inattention here.

I was more talking in general, where batsmen do attempt to gain the extra yard and yet for some reason it’s the bowler who is the dishonorable one. Every time there is a mankading people go on about the spirit of cricket and how inappropriate the bowler’s actions were. My point is that in the vast majority of cases, there wouldn’t be a mankading if the batsman wasn’t a cheat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, I wasn’t talking about this specific one. Agree that ashwin has stretched the rules to take advantage of inattention here.

I was more talking in general, where batsmen do attempt to gain the extra yard and yet for some reason it’s the bowler who is the dishonorable one. The point is that in the vast majority of cases, there wouldn’t be a mankading if the batsman wasn’t a cheat.

Been involved in cricket all my life only seen it happen once ( to me ! ) and can hardly remember bowlers warning batsmen.

Would still give a warning even if I thought they were taking the piss

After that mind ....
 
The stigma associated with mankading needs to go away.

Now agreed, this specific instance ashwin found a loophole in the way the laws are written and took advantage of buttler’s inattentiveness, but in most cases mankading can’t even occur unless the batsman has been trying to cheat

These calls of ‘you gotta warn the batsman’ are, quite frankly, stupid. Do you have an obligation to warn the thief who steals into your house the first time you see him? Or are you going to punch them in the mouth at earliest opportunity ?

That quite frankly is a ridiculous comparison.
 
That quite frankly is a ridiculous comparison.

Agree, but it’s apt

It’s ridiculous to compare a batsman stealing a yard to a thief stealing from your house

Just like it is ridiculous to accuse a bowler of cheating when he’s actually the one ensuring the rules are enforced

In fact, i’d like to make another ridiculous but yet strangely apt comparison. Accusing the bowler of unbecoming conduct for a mankading is like accusing a woman of assault because she kneed her would-be rapist in the balls.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top