• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Maja

Status
Not open for further replies.
O


Yeah it absolutely was a risk

Hope you’re right, I suspect it will be grigg meaning we’ve not needed to spend any of their own money and we get Grant on a free

That’s what I suspect, hopefully they prove me wrong

Just hope it doesn’t cost us promotion

i didn't think it was a risk as i expected maja to hit 20 goals and he would have surpassed that tally.

they don't need to spend any of their money if the fee for maja is correct. we shouldn't be wasting money in this league. grigg scores goals at this level and kimpioka can be given a chance to develop
 

It's salary cost management protocol (scmp). Players wages limited to 60% of turnover I think

75% of "relevant income" for the first season after relegation, then it drops to 60%. That includes prize money and transfer income. It would normally also include the parachute money, but as they were already committed to paying off pre-existing transfer creditors, the EFL are ignoring them for us. the higher than budgeted gates should see an increase in our allowable wage bill.
 
75% of "relevant income" for the first season after relegation, then it drops to 60%. That includes prize money and transfer income. It would normally also include the parachute money, but as they were already committed to paying off pre-existing transfer creditors, the EFL are ignoring them for us. the higher than budgeted gates should see an increase in our allowable wage bill.

Yep.
 
i didn't think it was a risk as i expected maja to hit 20 goals and he would have surpassed that tally.

they don't need to spend any of their money if the fee for maja is correct. we shouldn't be wasting money in this league. grigg scores goals at this level and kimpioka can be given a chance to develop

Spending money doesn’t mean wasting like
How’s that view started?

I think it’s a hell of a risk, let’s see who they sign, I’m disappointed that’s all personally.
 
Irrespective is promotion worth more than £3.5 million?

No - next season we get the year 3 parachute whichever division we're in, rather than the amounts due from the EFL and the PL solidarity payment. There might be a small uplift in gates and commercial income, but that's about it.
 
Do you expect us to spend all of the money we get

I think we will sign grigg, which we already tying to do, leadbitter on a loan and maybe a loan. I can’t see them spending any decent amount of it

It just reminds me off last Jan, losing grabban relegated us, let’s hope we have someone other than Grigg lined up
 
No - next season we get the year 3 parachute whichever division we're in, rather than the amounts due from the EFL and the PL solidarity payment. There might be a small uplift in gates and commercial income, but that's about it.

Simply getting out of the division is worth that. No one knows how it would pan out with another year down in this shite league.
 
Went in yesterday, cleared all his stuff out, told Ross he was never playing for the club again.
No fee agreed with bordeaux, he's trying to force a move.

Unbelievably bad attitude. I'm surprised but probably shouldn't be.

Get as much as we can, get him out the door and bring a replacement in asap.
 
No - next season we get the year 3 parachute whichever division we're in, rather than the amounts due from the EFL and the PL solidarity payment. There might be a small uplift in gates and commercial income, but that's about it.

:lol: Here we go

Crowds would be massively down if we stay in league one and players will want to leave

I’m shocked my sons of your statements and what you’re happy to accept. It’s mad
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top