toosb
Striker
What I meant was the attraction wasn't her age.
I posted this earlier.
The judge accepted this at the trial.
Amazing (not) that the press ignore this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I meant was the attraction wasn't her age.
That's why I said the fallout would be on another levelChed Evans was innocent though and never admitted to commiting what he was convicted of. Johnson on the other hand has admitted it so its massively different
Yet he said in court that he thought he was just flirting through the messages, he didn't know it was grooming and he didn't know just a kiss was sexual contact, he told them he intended to plead not guilty to all charges, the club was advised by the FA that he was ok to play, he was innocent until proved guilty at the time, he should have been suspended when these allegations surfaced, she probably knew he would be found guilty on them charges but he was denying them at the time.I will clear it up for you even though you are clearly playing ignorant.
After first strenuously denying the claims raised in court and subsequently going into hiding the chief executive of the club admitted that she had all of the information regarding the charges including police statements,whatsapp messages etc which she read and then chose to ignore and even the fact he ADMITTED TO GROOMING AND KISSING a 15 year old fan so that he could continue to play.
She then resigned (not sacked) amid a blaze of controversy for the massive error in judgement which she took sole blame for and was then punished further by the club for this heinous decision .....
You must be logged on to see external links
I do.You dont know that
Was Byrne not a solicitor?, surely then she would have been covered by client confidentiality?I will clear it up for you even though you are clearly playing ignorant.
After first strenuously denying the claims raised in court and subsequently going into hiding the chief executive of the club admitted that she had all of the information regarding the charges including police statements,whatsapp messages etc which she read and then chose to ignore and even the fact he ADMITTED TO GROOMING AND KISSING a 15 year old fan so that he could continue to play.
She then resigned (not sacked) amid a blaze of controversy for the massive error in judgement which she took sole blame for and was then punished further by the club for this heinous decision .....
You must be logged on to see external links
wear seatbeats!This is the story
You must be logged on to see external links
Didn't she get a monster payout from the club when she left?I will clear it up for you even though you are clearly playing ignorant.
After first strenuously denying the claims raised in court and subsequently going into hiding the chief executive of the club admitted that she had all of the information regarding the charges including police statements,whatsapp messages etc which she read and then chose to ignore and even the fact he ADMITTED TO GROOMING AND KISSING a 15 year old fan so that he could continue to play.
She then resigned (not sacked) amid a blaze of controversy for the massive error in judgement which she took sole blame for and was then punished further by the club for this heinous decision .....
You must be logged on to see external links
That's not how attorney client privilege works. She wasn't acting as Johnson's legal counsel, she was CEO of his employer.Was Byrne not a solicitor?, surely then she would have been covered by client confidentiality?
Yet he said in court that he thought he was just flirting through the messages, he didn't know it was grooming and he didn't know just a kiss was sexual contact, he told them he intended to plead not guilty to all charges, the club was advised by the FA that he was ok to play, he was innocent until proved guilty at the time, he should have been suspended when these allegations surfaced, she probably knew he would be found guilty on them charges but he was denying them at the time.
I do.
Link to that please ?Johnson's internet records showed he had looked up the age of consent on more than one occasion
He was given six years if he has been of good behaviour he will serve 3 years when was he convicted ?He be out in 2019 for good behaviour.
Bring him home!
He'll excel in League 1 and tear League 2 up.
Link to that please ?
I know he did that mate, the poster said more than one occasion, which is a load of shite.From the daily torygrapgh
It also emerged during the trial that Johnson had conducted internet searches about the "age of consent" just four days after his meeting with the 15-year-old.
Perhaps unsurprisingly the schoolgirl, who had caught the eye of a millionaire footballer, was not able to keep quiet about the encounter, confiding in her fascinated friends and even secretly filming the encounter on her mobile phone.
I know he did that mate, the poster said more than one occasion, which is a load of shite.
"Searched"'searches'
"Searched"
Dunno if it's been said but Lee Hughes, Luke McCormack and Marcos Alonso have all done worse and were able to resume their careers.
The judge said searched in his trial....Nah, it definitely says 'searches' (plural).
On 3rd February, at a time when you said in evidence that you were at Sunderland’s training ground you searched the Internet for information as to the age of consent for sexual activity.
Dunno if it's been said but Lee Hughes, Luke McCormack and Marcos Alonso have all done worse and were able to resume their careers.
Haven't seen anyone defending him, have seen people like you posting innacurate info to make it look he is worse than what he is, even though what he is is bad enough.The level of people defending and openly making excuses for this cretin is staggering. Hes a convicted child sex offender FFS
Haven't seen anyone defending him, have seen people like you posting innacurate info to make it look he is worse than what he is, even though what he is is bad enough.