• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

How long can Rafa last?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Like you’ve called me an angry person constantly? A bit hypocritical no?

No flies on you, I suppose the avatar is a bit of a give away.
No, Zig it's not really. You come across angry on here. trying to provoke a reaction from Newcastle fans on here, insulting them and using a confrontational tone. I call it like I see it.

Yet you insist I am an overweight fanzine editor in his 50s, called Ian. Rather specific, isn't it? :lol:
 

Serious question for the SMB Mags.

If the new owners want to ditch Benitez, as part of the deal, do you still want the sale to go through?
 
Serious question for the SMB Mags.

If the new owners want to ditch Benitez, as part of the deal, do you still want the sale to go through?

Is this ditching him day one without an explanation or having someone in place to replace him and making their explanation public?
 
Serious question for the SMB Mags.

If the new owners want to ditch Benitez, as part of the deal, do you still want the sale to go through?
If he was replaced with a manager of the same quality, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
 
Is this ditching him day one without an explanation or having someone in place to replace him and making their explanation public?
Just answer the question or don't, it not Crown Court ffs.
 
No, Zig it's not really. You come across angry on here. trying to provoke a reaction from Newcastle fans on here, insulting them and using a confrontational tone. I call it like I see it.

Yet you insist I am an overweight fanzine editor in his 50s, called Ian. Rather specific, isn't it? :lol:
Yet you agree you you can’t judge someone by their words on here, this is becoming difficult for you.

You need to point me in the direction of this anger, all I can see is ripping the piss and telling a few home truths, you and others are sad bastards, you spend far too much time wasting your lives away worrying about what we think.

Your posts show that, accept your frustrations and move on, if you think a few words show someone’s anger than that’s your opinion, it’s incorrect but your opinion. You’ve been on this forum all day yet again man, dedicate what’s left of it towards something else.

Fishy lad :lol: you sound furious, don't let zig get to you ffs :rolleyes::lol:
No man, there’s only myself who gets angry, he can tell because I used a few swear words. :lol:

If he was replaced with a manager of the same quality, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
Mate you were doing so well until that post.

Who is of similar quality?
 
Last edited:
Just answer the question or don't, it not Crown Court ffs.

Aye then. In my world he’s replaced by a clone of Alex Ferguson aged 40 years old with £100bn to spend.

I’ll be okay with that.

If someone came in, bought Ellis’s Short out and bulldozed the Stadium of Light would you want it to go ahead?

You can’t expect a discussion around that question without any context, man.
 
Aye then. In my world he’s replaced by a clone of Alex Ferguson aged 40 years old with £100bn to spend.

I’ll be okay with that.

If someone came in, bought Ellis’s Short out and bulldozed the Stadium of Light would you want it to go ahead?

You can’t expect a discussion around that question without any context, man.

There is no context.

It's a straightforward question.

If the consortium won't accept Benitez would you still want the takeover to happen?

The new manager would then be chosen and a budget agreed.

It's a 'yes' or 'no' based on that info.

As I said either answer or don't, there are plenty of other Mags capable of an answer.
 
Yet you agree you you can’t judge someone by their words on here, this is becoming difficult for you.

You need to point me in the direction of this anger, all I can see is ripping the piss and telling a few home truths, you and others are sad bastards, you spend far too much time wasting your lives away worrying about what we think.

Your posts show that, accept your frustrations and move on, if you think a few words show someone’s anger than that’s your opinion, it’s incorrect but your opinion. You’ve been on this forum all day yet again man, dedicate what’s left of it towards something else.


No man, there’s only myself who gets angry, he can tell because I used a few swear words. :lol:


Mate you were doing so well until that post.

Who is of similar quality?
Oo-er did I fall into some kind of trap there?
Basically any manager who has proven that he can successfully keep a team in the Prem and improve it year on year. I support Newcastle, meaning whoever is playing and managing at any given time.
Now I'm not going to get pelters for that surely? We all would like that for our teams, wouldn't we?
 
There is no context.

It's a straightforward question.

If the consortium won't accept Benitez would you still want the takeover to happen?

The new manager would then be chosen and a budget agreed.

It's a 'yes' or 'no' based on that info.

As I said either answer or don't, there are plenty of other Mags capable of an answer.

There are? The only one I’ve seen has put a caveat in there. Care to point me to the others who have answered your question?

I get it, you want me to choose a blind takeover with no foresight of any action beyond their initial sacking of Rafa Benitez. The alternative is I say no and you can play the ‘Mags love Rafa so much they’d turn down a takeover card’. It’s a bit transparent like.

New owners could spend hundreds of millions and get a equal or greater manager in or they could spend fuck all, sack Benitez and get John Carver back.

If it’s the former it’s a yes. If it’s the latter, absolutely f***ing not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top