• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Rafa. He's still not happy

Status
Not open for further replies.

You'll be disappointed when he fucks them off then? Righto :lol:



Real Madrid U-19s

Spain U-19 League: 1992–93
Spain U-19 Cup: 1990–91, 1992–93
Extremadura

Segunda División promotion: 1997–98
Tenerife

Segunda División promotion: 2000–01
Valencia

La Liga: 2001–02, 2003–04
UEFA Cup: 2003–04
Liverpool

FA Cup: 2005–06
FA Community Shield: 2006
UEFA Champions League: 2004–05
UEFA Super Cup: 2005
Inter Milan

Supercoppa Italiana: 2010
FIFA Club World Cup: 2010
Chelsea

UEFA Europa League: 2012–13
Napoli

Coppa Italia: 2013–14
Supercoppa Italiana: 2014
Newcastle United

EFL Championship: 2016–17[132]
Individual

La Liga Best Coach: 2002
UEFA Manager of the Year: 2003–04, 2004–05
European Coach of the Year—Alf Ramsey Award: 2005
LMA Special Merit Award: 2006[citation needed]
Premier League Manager of the Month: November 2005, December 2005, January 2007, October 2008, March 2009, April 2013
EFL Championship Manager of the Month: October 2016


What a berk you are mate. "COULDN'T EVEN BEAT VILLA THOUGH"

Obvious Mag doesn't mention Rafa's relegations in Spain. Obvious innit?
 
Think they loaned Remy marra. Don't let that distract you though.

They.... just give up your covers blown. There's been plenty mags pretending to be lads fans who have been far more intelligent than you and they still got outed.

Your not the first and you won't be the last but you maybe the thickest we've had.
 
Did Arsenal downgrade when they sold Anelka for £22m and bought Henry for 11?

They finished a point behind Man Utd on 78 and 79 points respectively. They then sold Anelka and bought Henry and had a net spend that year of minus £7m.
The next season they finished with 73 points, 18 behind Man Utd.

So did their negative net spend downgrade their squad?

You tell me, matey.
 
They.... just give up your covers blown. There's been plenty mags pretending to be lads fans who have been far more intelligent than you and they still got outed.

Your not the first and you won't be the last but you maybe the thickest we've had.

I've pulled you up on this 3 times now mate. I'm going to stop replying to you because you're not going to be taught on any issue.
 
They finished a point behind Man Utd on 78 and 79 points respectively. They then sold Anelka and bought Henry and had a net spend that of minus £7m.
The next season they finished with 73 points, 18 behind Man Utd.

So did their negative net spend downgrade their squad?

You tell me, matey.

So, that particular deal was a downgrade?
 
His position is that net spend doesn't matter if there's a large outlay. He argues that Benitez overseeing £105m(?) outgoings and £85m(?) should mean that they should have improved. Yet he can't apply that logic to Barca selling Neymar and spending over £90m on Dembele. I've asked him to explain and all I get is "Meltdown :lol: :lol:"

Taking incomings/outgoings in this latest window there are 6 teams who have a lower net spend than Newcastle do under Benitez. (Leicester, Southampton, Stoke, West Ham, Burnley, Spurs)

Just looking at spend there are 6 teams who have a lower spend than Newcastle do under Benitez (Brighton, Palace, Stoke, Bournemouth, Swansea & Southampton)

Whilst the proof will be in the pudding and people could debate for hours whether these teams have improved their squads the argument around spend/net spend is pretty much irrelevant as it is what you do with the money at your disposal that counts, could a 'world class' manager like Benitez not compete with a guy at Swansea who has spent most of his time coaching rather than managing for Renato Sanches, Sam Clucas and Tammy Abraham who are all better than what Benitez currently has? Does Benitez's managerial stature in the game not eclipse Mark Hughes who has been able to add the likes of Choupo-Moting and Jese Rodriguez?

I know quite a few mags who agree, I also know quite few that don't and simply won't have it.........each to their own I guess, He may well be hamstrung slightly by Ashley but when you compare his business to that at other clubs I personally think this use of spend/net spend (whatever you choose) doesn't hold much water. In my opinion the money he has spent hasn't improved the team/squad for the mags, despite there being value out in the market and he has to shoulder a large chunk of that responsibility.
 
This is the time for benitez's world class managerial experience to be shown to the world

If it's true of course, Rafa should be able to do any job, anywhere, without the need of spending £100 million

That is what all the top managers do like. I've heard Mourinho is considering taking the Stevenage job to prove a point

So, that particular deal was a downgrade?

:lol: I've given you the stats of what happened to them for spending less than they made. You can draw your own conclusions.

Could go gold this thread as he's not going to give up :lol::lol:



Mag logic :lol:



Pulled me on what... your the only one who's been outed and rattled.

We're all having a laugh at your expense

YOU'RE. f***ing YOU'RE.

;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't even know the figures but I'm pretty sure you've just magicked around £20m on top of the actual figure

It doesn't matter how large the numbers are. If you sell what you have and replace it for less then you generally get weaker. Easy this.

Generally, maybe. But not when you're getting £30m for sissoko as part of that. He had a few good games at the euros and his value increased considerably. Unfortunately for you lot FSW has bought average players and now has to actaully manage
 
That is what all the top managers do like. I've heard Mourinho is considering taking the Stevenage job to prove a point



:lol: I've given you the stats of what happened to them for spending less than they made. You can draw your own conclusions.



YOU'RE. f***ing YOU'RE.

;)

I don't care about grammar your still a bellend and a mag
 
That is what all the top managers do like. I've heard Mourinho is considering taking the Stevenage job to prove a point



:lol: I've given you the stats of what happened to them for spending less than they made. You can draw your own conclusions.



YOU'RE. f***ing YOU'RE.

So, you are actually saying Thierry Henry was a downgrade on Anelka due to one season where Man Utd won everything?
 
That is what all the top managers do like. I've heard Mourinho is considering taking the Stevenage job to prove a point



:lol: I've given you the stats of what happened to them for spending less than they made. You can draw your own conclusions.



YOU'RE. f***ing YOU'RE.

;)
I bet your mother likes you, as no one else does.
 
I've given you the stats of what happened to them for spending less than they made. You can draw your own conclusions.

What an absolute spenk.

It has been proven beyond doubt that historically it's not the clubs who spend the most who win the most.

Success is driven by your wage bill. Teams that pay the most in salaries have won the most historically - not teams who pay the most for players.

I appreciate the irony of a Sunderland fan writing this.

Educate yourself, read Soccernomics. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Soccernomics-Simon-Kuper/dp/0007457847
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top