Or you could just reply, I wasn't being arsey, I think it's a reasonable question.
You seem to ask this question very often, deliberately or not choosing a volatile, controversial manager (normally, if not always, Nigel Pearson).
Forgive me for thinking you're being 'arsey' but every bit of negative news about Newcastle United is littered with daft responses from almost Mag the lines of you'll burst or you'll wee yourself, etc.
You don't come across as the most objectionable but I'll humour you anyway:
A sizeable chunk of the reasoning why I (I can't speak for anyone else) have took to Benitez is because he's very likeable (in massive contrast to Pearson, Pardew,McClaren, Kinnear and Carver).
He seems to want the best for the club, never dumbs down our expectations in a negative way (unlike Alan 'I hope we can match Morecambe' Pardew) and brings a positive energy to the club. Fuck knows we need it under the other administration.
Hasn't there been a thread or two on here praising Simon Grayson for how he has spoken about 'only wanting players who want to play for the club'? North East football (Newcastle in particular prior to Moyes rocking up at your place) has been dogged by negative characters who play down our expectations and have zero ambition.
Benitez's and now Grayson's comments are a breath of fresh air and show understanding of the size of the respective clubs they are at.
That's the difference which Nigel Pearson (with his abrasive personality) would not have given.
EDIT - Alas, you (and others) have already made your judgement of my response in a previous post.