Mag hypocrisy ?

[SnakeEyes]

That goes without saying, with the view of hindsight. But a drop to 5th at the time was seen as a regression from what had happened the previous two seasons.

If Reid was from the area and had the same trajectory as Robson who's to say what would have happened? The side that finished 7th is fondly remembered on here very often so imagine one that finished 3rd and qualified for the Champions League...

Yeah I totally agree mate. He'd be hero worshipped. But I'd hope we wouldn't hound him out first sight of under performance.

 

[Sima]

Yeah I totally agree mate. He'd be hero worshipped. But I'd hope we wouldn't hound him out first sight of under performance.

Who's to know what would have happened?

Poyet got you to Wembley but there was massive discontent a few months later and Moyes was getting stick very soon after he was appointed. Football fans are fickle, look at some of the stick Ranieri is getting now.

'Success' is relative and any regression (rightly or wrongly) takes into account recent history and not what has happened 5-10 years ago.

 

[Zig81]

You did, for f***ing ages until I pressed you relentlessly into proving your point by posting my name. You claimed to know me/of me for months man.

#125

#1794

#397

Just remembered 'Keith'

Standard retort on the last line again. Why are you concerned about what I do with my time? Stop embarrassing yourself, man.

No, I kept saying what I was told in good faith by a mate, a good mate. When he couldn't back it up when I caught up with him I did what I said I would do, you know the bit you've already confirmed you clown.

Now, you seem to be claiming these standards retorts, which one is stamdard the first or the second one?

I'm not concerned at all, I just find any mag who lives their sad lives on here extremely weird and a bit of a sad **** to be fair. I coyld think of nothing worsee than spending my time on a mag forum, do you go on them too?

 

[Sima]

No, I kept saying what I was told in good faith by a mate, a good mate. When he couldn't back it up when I caught up with him I did what I said I would do, you know the bit you've already confirmed you clown.

Now, you seem to be claiming these standards retorts, which one is stamdard the first or the second one?

I'm not concerned at all, I just find any mag who lives their sad lives on here extremely weird and a bit of a sad **** to be fair. I coyld think of nothing worsee than spending my time on a mag forum, do you go on them too?

You need new mates. Why were you discussing a Newcastle fan on an internet messageboard anyway? I wouldn't dream of discussing the people I talk to online with my mates. Seems a bit odd and obsessive...

It's not just one mate by the way. You mentioned 'the lads' on one link and another poster on here that has a brother in law that knows me in another. Do you really discuss me with this many people?

Both retorts are standard. You're not the only one guilty of the 'obsessed mag on our board' fwiw, it's a common retort when a 'debate' is being lost and the Sunderland fan in this instance doesn't have anything further to offer.

The other is frequently posted by yourself

Obsessed, reply in 3,2,1.......

Or variations of the same message.

Yes, I do go on Newcastle forums.

 

[SnakeEyes]

Who's to know what would have happened?

Poyet got you to Wembley but there was massive discontent a few months later and Moyes was getting stick very soon after he was appointed. Football fans are fickle, look at some of the stick Ranieri is getting now.

'Success' is relative and any regression (rightly or wrongly) takes into account recent history and not what has happened 5-10 years ago.

Yeah that's very true. But I'd also criticise Leicester supporters. Ranieri won the league last season massively against the odds. Your 100% correct tho football fans are fickle. I personally don't blame moyes for this season and I suspect it wouldn't be too much better if BSA had stayed. We have deeper problems than blaming the manager.

 

[Sima]

Yeah that's very true. But I'd also criticise Leicester supporters. Ranieri won the league last season massively against the odds. Your 100% correct tho football fans are fickle. I personally don't blame moyes for this season and I suspect it wouldn't be too much better if BSA had stayed. We have deeper problems than blaming the manager.

I completely agree.

You seem like one of the more reasonable fans and not a rabid frother who will lurch in a bi-polar manner from one extreme to the other. Unfortunately there are others that aren't so level-headed.

 

[Zig81]

You need new mates. Why were you discussing a Newcastle fan on an internet messageboard anyway? I wouldn't dream of discussing the people I talk to online with my mates. Seems a bit odd and obsessive...

It's not just one mate by the way. You mentioned 'the lads' on one link and another poster on here that has a brother in law that knows me in another. Do you really discuss me with this many people?

Both retorts are standard. You're not the only one guilty of the 'obsessed mag on our board' fwiw, it's a common retort when a 'debate' is being lost and the Sunderland fan in this instance doesn't have anything further to offer.

The other is frequently posted by yourself



Or variations of the same message.

Yes, I do go on Newcastle forums.

You go on mag forums? How the fuck do you fit all this in? You say you have a job, a family including a young child, yet you've spent over 5 hours of your Saturday sat spouting the same drivel on this very forum!

Obsessed mag is a common retort as it's actually a fact, when you spend the amount of time you do on an almost daily basis on RTG this could be classed as an obsession, agree?

 

[Latka Gravas]

If she was from Wallsend I bet she was scruffy as fuck

 

[Sima]

You go on mag forums? How the fuck do you fit all this in? You say you have a job, a family including a young child, yet you've spent over 5 hours of your Saturday sat spouting the same drivel on this very forum!

Obsessed mag is a common retort as it's actually a fact, when you spend the amount of time you do on an almost daily basis on RTG this could be classed as an obsession, agree?

Opinion.

Some may say discussing me with others in real life on multiple occasions over many months is obsessive but that would again, be an (my) opinion. By saying five hours I assume you've actually looked at my posting times but, again, I'm the one 'obsessed'...

Who is the poster who has a brother in law that knows me/of me btw?

 

[Reiver]

You go on mag forums? How the fuck do you fit all this in? You say you have a job, a family including a young child, yet you've spent over 5 hours of your Saturday sat spouting the same drivel on this very forum!

Obsessed mag is a common retort as it's actually a fact, when you spend the amount of time you do on an almost daily basis on RTG this could be classed as an obsession, agree?

I'm told it's not drivel ...... apparently it's correcting errors, putting an alternative point of view and adding colour to the board.

So, you've been told.

 

[Sima]

I'm told it's not drivel ...... apparently it's correcting errors, putting an alternative point of view and adding colour to the board.

So, you've been told.

I've said I do all 3 of these things?

 

[Reiver]

I've said I do all 3 of these things?

I'm talking generally about you and your mates like Fish, Beaches, etc who claim these things ..... you come on 'correcting mistakes'.

 

[Sima]

I'm talking generally about your mates like Fish, Beaches, etc who claim these things.

Oh, fair enough. It's just that Zig81 explicitly said "you've" so he was addressing me personally and you commented further on that.

 

[Zig81]

Opinion.

Some may say discussing me with others in real life on multiple occasions over many months is obsessive but that would again, be an (my) opinion. By saying five hours I assume you've actually looked at my posting times but, again, I'm the one 'obsessed'...

Who is the poster who has a brother in law that knows me/of me btw?

Over 5 fuckin hours man! As for checking your posting history, I'm just making sure my facts are correct as I don't want you trying to pick me up for not getting my stats right. So it's quite clearly making an observation, not an obsession.

As for discussing you over a number of months with others in real life, can you back that accusation up or is that you once again rewriting history to suit your one sided argument?

@chico, have you seen this sad knacker living his life spouting shite on here yet again?

I'm told it's not drivel ...... apparently it's correcting errors, putting an alternative point of view and adding colour to the board.

So, you've been told.

The alternate view from someone who makes his views from what he sees on Sky Sports etc is laughable.

 

[AlpineExile]

Peter Reid had beer chucked over him and could barely leave his dugout towards end of his time here and I bet if he died tomorrow all our fans would be waxing lyrical about him. Fans in general are hypocrites not just mags.

As it turns out, it appears said beer was chucked over him by a mag.


But no doubt you'll claim you already knew that ...

 

[Reiver]

Over 5 fuckin hours man! As for checking your posting history, I'm just making sure my facts are correct as I don't want you trying to pick me up for not getting my stats right. So it's quite clearly making an observation, not an obsession.

As for discussing you over a number of months with others in real life, can you back that accusation up or is that you once again rewriting history to suit your one sided argument?

@chico, have you seen this sad knacker living his life spouting shite on here yet again?

The obvious difference is that you don't go onto his board to spend hours 'debating' with him ...... case closed.

 

[Sima]

Over 5 fuckin hours man! As for checking your posting history, I'm just making sure my facts are correct as I don't want you trying to pick me up for not getting my stats right. So it's quite clearly making an observation, not an obsession.

As for discussing you over a number of months with others in real life, can you back that accusation up or is that you once again rewriting history to suit your one sided argument?

@chico, have you seen this sad knacker living his life spouting shite on here yet again?

The links I posted earlier are posts made over a number of months that refer to you discussing me with 'the lads' or 'another poster on here' or even 'someone you class as family'

Maybe chico knows my name considering his brother in law knows me. Again calling me a 'sad knacker' despite you being the one who talks about a Newcastle fan on the internet with his friends

 

[Maximus]

Any one else have mags on fb commenting and sharing stuff about Sir Bobby? Got a good few sharing stuff on mine. I was seeing a lass from Wallsend when he was at the mags. I remember drinking in the club down there and was loads of season ticket holders wanted rid of him. Didn't one of them spit on him too?

Facebook

 

[Zig81]

The obvious difference is that you don't go onto his board to spend hours 'debating' with him.

I would rather shit in my hands and clap than go on a forum full of non attending plastic mags like him.

Have you noticed the mags who spend an unhealthy amount of time on this forum don't go and support their team.

 

[Sima]

The obvious difference is that you don't go onto his board to spend hours 'debating' with him ...... case closed.

The old 'mag on a Sunderland messagboard retort' along with punctuation of 'CASE CLOSED' At least we got there sooner than we thought, I thought you were more capable than that.

You must have a toilet to clean... Did your gaffer buy you that new brush?