Buildings don't fall down just because they're on fire pt911

Status
Not open for further replies.


So you've got hundreds of similar report but then one turns up that is extraordinary, such a jump from the usual method of terror that you choose to ignore as farfetched? That doesn't say a lot for intelligence agencies does it?

It doesn't, but that's what happened.
 
So if we learn more about it. Then the gravity we think we know ceases to exist and a new theory of gravity is formed.

Attack the message on this thread marra not the messenger.

We can debate gravity on a related thread but atm we can't derail this thread further.

Can we talk about the airspace that you yourself brought up? You know, to get the thread back on track.
 
Apparently they knew about pearl harbour before it happened but didn't do anything, h a s anyone heard owt about that?
 
I've heard a bit about the asbestos issue, any links? Regarding Silverstein, if he is leasing the building then presumably he wouldn't be involved with the asbestos issue, as he is just leasing the building? Not sure how it works tbh

Not sure myself mate. But apparently they were liable. The twin towers had been getting exemptions from the Newyork port authority but tine was up. They needed sorting which was gonna cost billions.

Corse I got links mate. But you might find them a tad biased. Better dig yourself to come to your own conclusions. Pay particular attention to the time lines of his involvement, the changing of policies, the monies involved, the court battle that the insurance companies had with him.

The video I posted earlier has loads on him


Larry Silverstein
 
The point is people will do what they are told to do if they believe in a cause. It doesnt take thousands of people to do something like this.
Maybe not, but you couldn't possibly keep it secret from the likes of wikileaks who haven't released a single document referring to anything if the sort. And they released a lot of stuff. Have you looked to see if you can find anything?
 
Maybe not, but you couldn't possibly keep it secret from the likes of wikileaks who haven't released a single document referring to anything if the sort. And they released a lot of stuff. Have you looked to see if you can find anything?
Not the best link in the world but I'm going to have social services at my door if I don't get off here and go and feed the kids.

Were you there?
No, but I'm not saying categorically that something is wrong.
 
What would you like to know mate? I was refering to get restricted airspace around Washington.

Yes, can you tell me how it was more secure than say, the areas around other centres of governments, nuclear power stations, other sites where an aircraft crashing into it might be even more catastrophic?
 
who'd have thought metal would bend when it gets git hot

Who would have funk it that something so catastrophic would result in zero building regulations changes. After all that bit of metal bending from fire has brought down how many buildings? Ahhhh that's right. Zero. Not counting that day of course

Yes, can you tell me how it was more secure than say, the areas around other centres of governments, nuclear power stations, other sites where an aircraft crashing into it might be even more catastrophic?

When I said more protected. I'm refering to the fact that airspace around USA is more than say other countries.

Not sure what point you are trying to make. Apart from attempting to have funnies.
 
Last edited:
When I said more protected. I'm refering to the fact that airspace around USA is more than say other countries.

Not sure what point you are trying to make. Apart from attempting to have funnies.

How is airspace more protected in the US than in other countries?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top