Black Cat Gypsy
Striker
I think Congerton isn't up to the job and I'm critical of his methods. But I also get the feeling he's handicapped by Short refusal to invest probably.We are now feeling sorry for Congerton?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think Congerton isn't up to the job and I'm critical of his methods. But I also get the feeling he's handicapped by Short refusal to invest probably.We are now feeling sorry for Congerton?
The situation atm seems a little different.Or any manager in the league I'm sure they all want more players. As do I.
Allardyce wasn't interested before & he wouldn't be interested now under this set up.
Seen his press conference an you can see the go at Short while praising Congerton with the constraints he has to work under ...but Dick wants three players in... Said weeks ago .that Dick will walk and on the basis of ambition by the board who could blame him...Suprisingly no comments from the CEO@CraigHope_DM: Dick Advocaat future as SAFC boss in fresh doubt tonight after taking swipe at Ellis Short & admitting he's not happyYou must be logged on to see external links
Why?The situation atm seems a little different.
It's unbelievable, idiotic[/QUOTE]Wow. Just unreal on here.
Shows his lack of footballing nous then if he thinks that. The results make no odds. Win, lose or draw you have to spend. The result should not be the deciding factor in determining whether you spend money on signings or not. When have you known Ellis Short to pull money out of his pocket no matter how well or bad we have been doing? Ellis is not up to the job and what time will tell is whether or not he will come to realize that.
Supporters disappointed we didn't get heavily beaten - that's shameful in any circumstances imho.
I can't argue with that mate, however this time it feels like a watershed and maybe what's left of our luck could be about to run out. I hope I'm wrong , and I usually am, time will tell.Whilst it's a worrying trend, we've heard this a number of times before.
But a large proportion of that loss could have been down to terminating the contracts of the people he wrongly appointed in the first place.
A large portion?
I can't argue with that mate, however this time it feels like a watershed and maybe what's left of our luck could be about to run out. I hope I'm wrong , and I usually am, time will tell.
3 defeats in a row & he might open the war chest just 1 more time.
He's a billionaire hedge fund specialist. He's been successful in everything he's done apart from us. Possibly he truly believed that no appointee of his would have the audacity to get up on his back legs and tell him a few home truths. Honestly, did he really believe that a man like Advocaat would come out of retirement to roll over quietly if it all went tits up? I don't think it's strange at all that he wanted Advocaat,I truly believe that in his arrogance Short thought he would do as he was told. Undoubtedly short has spent huge amounts of money keeping us going, and he deserves credit for that, but to baulk at investing further now, when in my opinion he has found someone who can spend it wisely makes no sense to me at all.If what you're saying is true, it seems a bit strange that he appointed Advocaat though: ideally he'd want a 'yes man', someone younger with less experience who would toe the party line, rather than a vastly experienced old head who was considering retiring and really has nothing to lose from telling it how it is.
I'd say sacking Di Canio, de Fanti, Angeloni plus the other ancillary staff would have cost a few quid like.......and it came only a few months after O'Neil and his entourage were sacked.....that little lot must have cost in excess of £10m.
He's a billionaire hedge fund specialist. He's been successful in everything he's done apart from us. Possibly he truly believed that no appointee of his would have the audacity to get up on his back legs and tell him a few home truths. Honestly, did he really believe that a man like Advocaat would come out of retirement to roll over quietly if it all went tits up? I don't think it's strange at all that he wanted Advocaat,I truly believe that in his arrogance Short thought he would do as he was told. Undoubtedly short has spent huge amounts of money keeping us going, and he deserves credit for that, but to baulk at investing further now, when in my opinion he has found someone who can spend it wisely makes no sense to me at all.
If the costs are over 3 mill a year I'd be absolutely gobsmacked
It was 20 mill last season. When did he cut the spending back?
I don't know Short from Adam so it's difficult to be sure, but if there's one type of person who is likely to come out and tell it as it is, it's a well-respected and experienced manager who could just tell him/us to fuck off at any given point and retire, and keep his good reputation completely intact.
It's a no lose situation for Advocaat imo, and it might be exactly what we need to find out exactly what's going on at the top of the club.