R
Reiver
Guest
Completely agree.
There is a very obvious reason why Liverpool were involved in incidents in the European Cup Final and an FA Cup semi final within a few years and, for example, we weren't.
However, going back to the Telegraph article, I think there is some truth in the claims by the Italian author - "From 1985 to 1989, the English were only angry about being banned from Europe, Heysel and Hillsborough had three important similarities: the disorganisation of the authorities, the behaviour of the police, and the fact that innocent people died. If the English had understood Heysel, Hillsborough today would only be the name of a stadium, not of a disaster."
The response to Heysel in this country showed a complete lack of understanding all around. The Government started pissing around with membership schemes and identity cards. The FA started inventing daft new trophies to replace the European tournaments. The general public wringed their hands because football fans were seen as an underclass who deserved what they got if they went to football matches. English football fans got annoyed by being banned from Europe and pointed to continental hooliganism. And nobody, until Lord Justice Taylor after Hillsborough, gave a thought to crowd safety, whether that be caused by fire, crushing, incompetent police, or hooliganism.
Some good points and it's relevant that unexpected things happened in a weird domino effect.
It may explain why some Italians, including Juventus supporters, turned into football hooligans.
Before Heysel I can't remember then being notorious for football violence, these day they're always happy to poke a knife in you.
I might be way off the mark and I've no doubt I'll be put straight by someone.