First sentence clears it up perfectly. Thanks for that.
.. so Opta, and the BBC & Sky have got it wrong .. I fear your going to have a hard life son ..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
First sentence clears it up perfectly. Thanks for that.
What the fuck are you going on about now? Seriously... so Opta, and the BBC & Sky have got it wrong .. I fear your going to have a hard life son ..
If the ball fails to reach the goalkeepe or reach the goalline, it isn't a shot. A shot on target is a shot which either provides a goal or requires the prevention of 1 via a save. A deflection is not a save, and if it was even, the deflection took the ball no further off target, it simply looped it up.
What the fuck are you going on about now? Seriously.
Good. That'll mean no more replies from you... it is only a shot on target if the player who deflects it is the last man, if the keeper's behind it does not count as a shot on target .. check what it says on Opta and if you check out the stats on both the BBC and Sky you will see that they both say 0 shots .. if your still not convinced then best of luck to you ..
.. naw .. you'd struggle to get it ..
.. it is only a shot on target if the player who deflects it is the last man, if the keeper's behind it does not count as a shot on target .. check what it says on Opta and if you check out the stats on both the BBC and Sky you will see that they both say 0 shots .. if your still not convinced then best of luck to you ..
.. naw .. you'd struggle to get it ..
He's confused. He thinks I'm awarding a shot on target to Newcastle.Check my post. I agreed with you. Replied to the wrong post, methinks
Check my post. I agreed with you. Replied to the wrong post, methinks
Let's recap. One poster, not me, said the stats he saw had given one shot on target to Newcastle. I questioned whether it could have been one particular incident, hence the question marks. It transpired that it wasn't, fair enough. I questioned what a particular scenario is classed as. You ignored that I wasn't talking about the Newcastle game anymore. The other poster cleared it up in one sentence. You continue to piss your knickers over something that isn't there... sorry .. my bad .. there's only one fella who desperate to give the mags a shot on target ..
Let's recap. One poster, not me, said the stats he saw had given one shot on target to Newcastle. I questioned whether it could have been one particular incident, hence the question marks. It transpired that it wasn't, fair enough. I questioned what a particular scenario is classed as. You ignored that I wasn't talking about the Newcastle game anymore. The other poster cleared it up in one sentence. You continue to piss your knickers over something that isn't there.