• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England Selectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter NOMOREFALSEDAWNS
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NOMOREFALSEDAWNS

Guest
Who exactly are they? I know Geoff Miller is one but who are the rest.
 

NOMOREFALSEDAWNS said:
Who exactly are they? I know Geoff Miller is one but who are the rest.
Click to expand...
Not sure who the selectors are but they went into this series with a plan of using tall fast bowlers in Australian conditions. After the first test that plan was in absolute tatters. Where are Tremlett, Finn and Rankin ?
They will not get a game unless England lose in Perth and lose the Ashes.
The selectors should be asked the real reason why Onions was not selected. I always thought you picked your best bowlers !
Clearly they spoke with the coach about the series plans and he must have agreed with the tall bowler theory ?
 
badger55 said:
Not sure who the selectors are but they went into this series with a plan of using tall fast bowlers in Australian conditions. After the first test that plan was in absolute tatters. Where are Tremlett, Finn and Rankin ?
They will not get a game unless England lose in Perth and lose the Ashes.
The selectors should be asked the real reason why Onions was not selected. I always thought you picked your best bowlers !
Clearly they spoke with the coach about the series plans and he must have agreed with the tall bowler theory ?
Click to expand...
A bit of a shambles really.They messed up big time.Tremlett has been dogged by injuries all his life and peaked in 2010 at this level so I believe Onions should have been selected in his place.Finn is a talent that must be persevered with whilethe selectors must not fancy him which begs the question why did they select him in the first place.I also think a batsman should have been called up to replace Trott in the squad.When he left there were still 4 tests to play.[DOUBLEPOST=1387029215][/DOUBLEPOST]
NOMOREFALSEDAWNS said:
A bit of a shambles really.They messed up big time.Tremlett has been dogged by injuries all his life and peaked in 2010 at this level so I believe Onions should have been selected in his place.Finn is a talent that must be persevered with whilethe selectors must not fancy him which begs the question why did they select him in the first place.I also think a batsman should have been called up to replace Trott in the squad.When he left there were still 4 tests to play.
Click to expand...
RANKIN(him)
 
chunkylover53 said:
Last tour I think. Then Whittaker takes over

Whilst onions should have gone, he may have got karted on these pitches
Click to expand...

he should have gone and should be providing competition to Anderson who hasnt looked threatening since the first test in the summer
 
chunkylover53 said:
I agree

But bowling 82-83mph with little lateral movement could be gruesome
Click to expand...

Probably. The main positive of Onions bowling is that he relentlessly attacks the stumps. I think he'd have been more useful in Brisbane and in Perth than Anderson
 
Tremlett was a bizarre selection, did they even look at his county form and fitness? An express bowler bowling at 80 mph!
 
Onions should have gone, the England management should have known Tremlett was over the hill, he bowled superb at the Riverside but it was clear to the naked eye that he was only able to bowl brisk meduim pace. The simple fact is the selectors don't think Onions is a test class bowler and the tragedy for Graeme is that he will probably never get a fair chance to see if he was good enough at international level.
 
wayne entwhistle no9 said:
Onions should have gone, the England management should have known Tremlett was over the hill, he bowled superb at the Riverside but it was clear to the naked eye that he was only able to bowl brisk meduim pace. The simple fact is the selectors don't think Onions is a test class bowler and the tragedy for Graeme is that he will probably never get a fair chance to see if he was good enough at international level.
Click to expand...

5/38 against the Windies is not to be sniffed at. The trouble is he didn't really do owt with the ball in South Africa, and is thus pigeon holed as a bowler for English conditions. Not picking him in the home Ashes was the bigger crime, especially at the Riverside. He should really get a shot against India but I am not going to hold my breath.
 
smoker said:
5/38 against the Windies is not to be sniffed at. The trouble is he didn't really do owt with the ball in South Africa, and is thus pigeon holed as a bowler for English conditions. Not picking him in the home Ashes was the bigger crime, especially at the Riverside. He should really get a shot against India but I am not going to hold my breath.
Click to expand...
That was a poorly written post by me i should have made it clear that it was Tremlett who bowled well at the Riverside for Surrey but was only brisk meduim pace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top