Super Ted
Striker
Am I right in thinking the second of the Academy lads (who has presumably signed a contract as he's a bit older) hasn't played for Washington this season? If the confusion on Washington's part comes down to the distinction between "contracted" and "non-contracted" Academy players then I've got some sympathy with them.
We appear to have our wires crossed - the above mentioned quotes were to do with the article that some idiot at WCC apparently wrote attributing made up quotes to mr real and other WCC officials. Mr real and I were discussing it by PM at the time as we were in the process of removing references to it from the BQ website on the grounds that it was a load of shite - those comments are meant for him and are tongue in cheek; as he well knows. It's all about context.
The whole "ineligible player" thing is a different discussion and I've only passed on what I've been told. I haven't once given my own opinion on it. You went very defensive very quickly.
I also take it that, seeing as you're waiting for the league to contact you with a "final decision" - the league have been in touch and WCC are now putting their case forward, which they are entirely entitled to do. Suggests that the league did make a decision on the issue in the first instance though which is all that's ever been said.
I don't know what you're getting your knickers in a twist about - presumably you've calmed down after the Harbour blocked out that draw and are now in need of something else to focus on. For the record, the world isn't against you and very few of us actually care what the leagues final decision is on this. But when word has gone round the league about a club being in hot water for fielding ineligible players it certainly warrants discussion on a messageboard thread entitled "Coast League Banter".
If anything in this thread, It seems you care more than anyone..