• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Drug dealers locked up

Status
Not open for further replies.

opium has been used for absolutely thousands of years by many, many civilisations. ampheatmines have been used extensively by NASA and the US armed forces. just bringing it back to your historcial point...

It doesn't fit, I was talking about historical context in our country. Yes, in Victorian times we had opium dens in London, but hardly gives it nationwide popular context like beer. Your other justification isn't even worth commenting on it's that worthless.
 
It doesn't fit, I was talking about historical context in our country. Yes, in Victorian times we had opium dens in London, but hardly gives it nationwide popular context like beer. Your other justification isn't even worth commenting on it's that worthless.

so you are not talking about legality, just social acceptance.
 
It doesn't fit, I was talking about historical context in our country. Yes, in Victorian times we had opium dens in London, but hardly gives it nationwide popular context like beer. Your other justification isn't even worth commenting on it's that worthless.

We went to war just so we could trade opium basically. Dunno why im bothering youre a blatant wind up
 
so you are not talking about legality, just social acceptance.

Legality and context, that is quite clear.

I will not be told on here by a group of charvas that cocaine is socially acceptable when I know full well it isn't to a very large percentage of the population.
 
It doesn't fit, I was talking about historical context in our country. Yes, in Victorian times we had opium dens in London, but hardly gives it nationwide popular context like beer. Your other justification isn't even worth commenting on it's that worthless.

Why is historical acceptance a logical reason for allowing the free sale and consumption of a substance as harmful, destructive and addictive as alcohol?
 
Legality and context, that is quite clear.

I will not be told on here by a group of charvas that cocaine is socially acceptable when I know full well it isn't to a very large percentage of the population.

How do you know they are all chavas? Know them all like?
 
Legality and context, that is quite clear.

I will not be told on here by a group of charvas that cocaine is socially acceptable when I know full well it isn't to a very large percentage of the population.

your justification was that we've been drinking alcohol for years. all i'm saying that opium for example has been around much, much longer and is still used in various countries today.

if you want to call me a charver go right ahead. i'm quite clearly not however.

if you go to a number of parties or bars in London you will find that coke is totally socially acceptbale. not my bag but who am i to judge.
 
your justification was that we've been drinking alcohol for years. all i'm saying that opium for example has been around much, much longer and is still used in various countries today.

if you want to call me a charver go right ahead. i'm quite clearly not however.

if you go to a number of parties or bars in London you will find that coke is totally socially acceptbale. not my bag but who am i to judge.

Or any other city in britain
 
your justification was that we've been drinking alcohol for years. all i'm saying that opium for example has been around much, much longer and is still used in various countries today.

if you want to call me a charver go right ahead. i'm quite clearly not however.

if you go to a number of parties or bars in London you will find that coke is totally socially acceptbale. not my bag but who am i to judge.

So what? If you go to a squat in a derelict house somewhere in London you'll probably find that heroin is socially acceptable.

You are completely missing my point for justification, it's not a time thing, people have killed each other for centuries but that doesn't make it acceptable, it's the context it has in society and how it is used. If you can't grasp that then please don't bother replying again.
 
Well, either charvas or ageing charvas that should really have grown up by now.

I am not massive on drugs but i did take them in my younger days, It is in every class from chav to middle then the rich twats. It is all around us.

Some people notice it some don't. Just the way it goes really. Most if not every pub will have had people take drugs in them some actually don't mind as the majority of the customers take the drugs.

Think its different sets of drugs that cause different problems smack heads are the worst type but also have rock stars hitting it back so once again like worlds apart.
 
I am not massive on drugs but i did take them in my younger days, It is in every class from chav to middle then the rich twats. It is all around us.

Some people notice it some don't. Just the way it goes really. Most if not every pub will have had people take drugs in them some actually don't mind as the majority of the customers take the drugs.

Think its different sets of drugs that cause different problems smack heads are the worst type but also have rock stars hitting it back so once again like worlds apart.

I think this is one of the worst parts about the 'stars'. They don't hide their use and have a really immature attitude about the use of drugs. Only recently did pensioner Paul McCartney say he was giving up weed, guess why? Because he didn't want his daughter influenced... Therefore it seems he was quite happy to influence other peoples children but not in his own back yard...

I'm suggesting that equally dangerous substances should be on equal terms legally.

What is equally as dangerous and how can you prove it?
 
I think this is one of the worst parts about the 'stars'. They don't hide their use and have a really immature attitude about the use of drugs. Only recently did pensioner Paul McCartney say he was giving up weed, guess why? Because he didn't want his daughter influenced... Therefore it seems he was quite happy to influence other peoples children but not in his own back yard...

Weed is one of the most harmless things out there like. It does nowt for me, I've done it four or five times and didn't think there was much point doing it again. Far less harmful than alcohol and far less addictive.
 
Weed is one of the most harmless things out there like. It does nowt for me, I've done it four or five times and didn't think there was much point doing it again. Far less harmful than alcohol and far less addictive.
and tabs iirc.

The biggest drugs problem I see on a daily basis in Tooting, London. Is the f***ing drunk twats hanging outside Sainsburys, drinking super strength lager bothering local shop keepers and generally being arseholes. They always seem to have black eye and cuts and grazes.
 
Last edited:
I think this is one of the worst parts about the 'stars'. They don't hide their use and have a really immature attitude about the use of drugs. Only recently did pensioner Paul McCartney say he was giving up weed, guess why? Because he didn't want his daughter influenced... Therefore it seems he was quite happy to influence other peoples children but not in his own back yard...



What is equally as dangerous and how can you prove it?

Logon or register to see this image
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top