• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Hants v Durham

Status
Not open for further replies.

142 for 1 at a run a ball if you only look at that partnership - what's your point?

that two world class batsman have made it look easy whereas the rest on both sides have struggled.

11 batsman are a far better indiction of what a wicket is like than 2 (one of which has arguably been Englands best one day batsman for the last 5 years until recently)
 
that two world class batsman have made it look easy whereas the rest on both sides have struggled.

11 batsman are a far better indiction of what a wicket is like than 2 (one of which has arguably been Englands best one day batsman for the last 5 years until recently)

Both past their prime and like you said they made it look easy
 
Nice of Sky to start dumming the game down as soon as it looked like a Durham win. God I hope we beat Hants in August, they would not know where to put themselves in the commentary box.
Especially that smug southern twat Colville.

Even with Hampshire playing almost a 2nd XI he still couldn't bring himself to predict a Durham win. :-x He's just got one of those faces I would never tire of punching.
 
no it wasnt. As the ball gets older on a dry turning track it sticks in the wicket and becomes harder to get away. Having lost 4 very quick wickets, Muchall took his time which was the right thing to do.

Its ok saying Plunkett smashes it but none of the batsman bar MDV and Colly had any success at coming in and 'smashing it' from the off

In any successful one day side you need a batsman of the ilk of Muchall

In fairness to Muchall not only is he the top scorer in the country with the highest average in the country in this competition he has also scored his runs at a fair lick. I agree with you his innings wasnt at all bad tonight - we had lost wickets in a hurry and him and Breese scored their partnership at more than a run a ball ensuring we got a total that wouldnt be beaten.
 
Did the rain come when Durham had had 34 overs or earlier?
 
Ah ok. So did Muchall know we only had 34 overs? That's what I'm getting at


Either way, Hampshire showed our batting to be far superior

Yeah he did - he came in at a time where we lost both Colly and DiVenuto and shortly after Blackwell and Benks so he started cautiously and then the rain came. He was struggling a bit and ended up looking to give Breese the strike who was in better nick - he also had to come back after a rain break.
 
i know it was a virtual reserve hampshire side last night, but it showed that our 3 spinners, are useful in those conditions at the rose bowl

yes they are ranked higher but you never know on the night, with T20 and if stokes is fit, to come in, i think durham have a decent chance of winning down there
 
i know it was a virtual reserve hampshire side last night, but it showed that our 3 spinners, are useful in those conditions at the rose bowl

yes they are ranked higher but you never know on the night, with T20 and if stokes is fit, to come in, i think durham have a decent chance of winning down there

Adams, Cork, Dawson, Carberry, Ervine are hardly reserves :lol:

The hardest bit will be knowing what a good score is. Our big guns simply have to come off ie, Colly, Benks and even MDV if he plays)
 
Last edited:
Adams, Cork, Dawson, Carberry, Ervine are hardly reserves :lol:

The hardest bit will be knowing what a good score is. Our big guns simply have to come off ie, Colly, Benks and even MDV if he plays)
true

i will be backing durham at 13/8 with corals



as for a good score, anything towards 150 batting first could be enough
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top