• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Stuart Broad

Status
Not open for further replies.

We won't get them out if we bowl like we have against SL. I like five bowlers in a side, always have.



Hush yourself, that's just a stupid comment.

let him carry on, always useful to watch people who know nothing pass judgement then we can always revisit the post at a later date
 
Morgan? Are you for real? At least he's made a f***ing contribution to the side, Broads done fuck all and never will

Hes for real - a bloke with a cricketing brain who knows the value at times of a 5 man bowling attack. Broads a good cricketer who is short of form but will turn it around sooner or later.
 
It wasnt that long ago Jimmy had a career average in the mid 30s

if it werent for the alarming drop in standard of test cricket/emergence of 20/20 he still would

:lol:

So when Bell's form improves it's because he's come good, when Jimmy does it it's because test cricket has got worse.

There are a lot more world class batsmen out there than there are bowlers. This was proven by one of the sky commentators yesterday. Ian Bell is 17th in the world batting rankings, Jerome Taylor is 17th in the world bowling averages, now which one of them is the better cricketer?
 
It wasnt that long ago Jimmy had a career average in the mid 30s

if it werent for the alarming drop in standard of test cricket/emergence of 20/20 he still would

:lol:

And in that period where Test cricket is shit and Jimmy's average is comfortably under 30, Stuart Broad's is.....?

Arf!!!
 
So then why is Broad's average in the mid-30's? :confused:

Because Jimmy has had the best part of 8 years in and out of the test arena to turn himself into a decent bowler

Broad is having a dip at the minute, all test players have one

So when Bell's form improves it's because he's come good, when Jimmy does it it's because test cricket has got worse.

There are a lot more world class batsmen out there than there are bowlers. This was proven by one of the sky commentators yesterday. Ian Bell is 17th in the world batting rankings, Jerome Taylor is 17th in the world bowling averages, now which one of them is the better cricketer?

The standard of bowling in test cricket is abysmal. I have never said Bell is the next Viv Richards (perhaps you can find the relevent post if I have). I simply said there is nobody better than Bell outside those already in the England side thus shouldnt be dropped.

What point are you trying to make
 
Because Jimmy has had the best part of 8 years in and out of the test arena to turn himself into a decent bowler

Broad is having a dip at the minute, all test players have one
Fair enough; and I actually agree he shouldn't be dropped. Despite his recent poor form he's still a long way ahead of the likes of Finn and Shahzad (who went at 7's against Durham today).

It's clear the England hierarchy also like a long batting line up. Broad at 8 fits the bill perfectly as I'm not sure the likes of Swann or Shahzad are up to that job if required.
 
The current 3 plus Onions are comfortably our best quicks IMO. If Onions is selected against India instead of Broad it wouldn't be outrageous but I think we will stick with what we have and on balance I think its the right way to go.
 
The current 3 plus Onions are comfortably our best quicks IMO. If Onions is selected against India instead of Broad it wouldn't be outrageous but I think we will stick with what we have and on balance I think its the right way to go.

at least your learning at last
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top