Galloping Foxley
Goalkeeper
“Rape, murder, arson and rape”.I think it's forcing his cock down the 16 year old's throat without her consent that's the less solid ground. That and the raping.
You said rape twice.
“I like rape”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“Rape, murder, arson and rape”.I think it's forcing his cock down the 16 year old's throat without her consent that's the less solid ground. That and the raping.
Pretty appalling that you appear to support a sex pest. Even for you it’s a new low.Watch the video instead of spamming.
What if he is found innocent are you going to still call him a Rapist.If he’s found guilty, will those openly supporting him both on here and in the media hold their hands up and condemn him? Or is rape in vogue nowedays?
Wellness Nazis Great name for a band.Six and a half million followers on YouTube, 11 million on Twitter. He's the guru of the wellness Nazis and the incels. This will probably only heighten their adoration of him - it'll be portrayed as a plot to stop him revealing 'the truth'.
No. They support sex pest Trump, sex pest Wooton and they now support a rapist of 16 year old girls in Brand.If he’s found guilty, will those openly supporting him both on here and in the media hold their hands up and condemn him? Or is rape in vogue nowedays?
A change to the age of consent seems like a sensible approach. I don't think her idea of making it illegal for someone over 21 to be with someone under 18 is workable mind, it would need to be x number of years older. By that, I mean that from what she's suggested a 21 year old could legally be with a 16 year old and then, in a year, they become 22 and can't legally be with the now 17 year old and would have to end the relationship for a year. I'd say that a 16 or 17 year old can only be sexually active with someone up to, say, 5 years older than them. So at 16 they can be with a 21 year old, and it's still fine at 17 and 22. Maybe 5 years is too much tbh, but regardless that seems like a better approach.This is an interesting article if you can find a way to read it
My mum couldn’t stop me dating Russell Brand — but the law should
What if he is found innocent are you going to still call him a Rapist.
I personally can't stand the bloke and if he is guilty he should go away for a long time.
But I believe people are defending, the mantra Innocent until proven Guilty.
Anyone still defending a convicted rapist if that be the case, should be called out and shamed.
You would hope any right minded person would completely disassociate themselves from him if he was
Don’t believe I’ve called him a rapist… but if I were a betting man…What if he is found innocent are you going to still call him a Rapist.
I personally can't stand the bloke and if he is guilty he should go away for a long time.
But I believe people are defending, the mantra Innocent until proven Guilty.
Anyone still defending a convicted rapist if that be the case, should be called out and shamed.
You would hope any right minded person would completely disassociate themselves from him if he was convicted.
Have you read some comments on this thread? They aren't defending him for his innocence, they are defending him because they believe its political. They think he is being silenced because of his political beliefs. It's just another conspiracy fairy tale to the gullible.What if he is found innocent are you going to still call him a Rapist.
I personally can't stand the bloke and if he is guilty he should go away for a long time.
But I believe people are defending, the mantra Innocent until proven Guilty.
Anyone still defending a convicted rapist if that be the case, should be called out and shamed.
You would hope any right minded person would completely disassociate themselves from him if he was convicted.
Yes, you didn't call him a Rapist, my apologies, and I absolutely agree about the suing part.Don’t believe I’ve called him a rapist… but if I were a betting man…
Anyone who has watched that show and read the times report and who are defending him want keeping an eye on too imho.
My take on the whole thing is if I got accused of what he has I’d be suing dispatches and the times for every penny they have. End of.
No need to apologise mate.Yes, you didn't call him a Rapist, my apologies, and I absolutely agree about the suing part.
I am trying to give a balanced view on the subject, even if I think he's a complete scumbag
I was just trying to give a balanced view,Have you read some comments on this thread? They aren't defending him for his innocence, they are defending him because they believe its political. They think he is being silenced because of his political beliefs. It's just another conspiracy fairy tale to the gullible.
Innocent until proven guilty is not their first concern.
I've got no defence for people who will defend him if he is convicted,and these people should be rightly called out,Have you read some comments on this thread? They aren't defending him for his innocence, they are defending him because they believe its political. They think he is being silenced because of his political beliefs. It's just another conspiracy fairy tale to the gullible.
Innocent until proven guilty is not their first concern.
Was the only way they could get to Gordon the gopher tbfMaybe one of the gullible who still believe this is political can explain why the "establishment" wanted to silence Philip Schofield and Huw Edwards.
That's dated 29th September 2022A new media advisory notice has been issued. Doesn't alter the fact that the Brand one was nonsense, but now the Attorney General has thrown Braverman under the bus.
Media Advisory Notice: The fatal police shooting of Chris Kaba
The Solicitor General has issued a Media Advisory Notice in relation to the fatal shooting of Chris Kabawww.gov.uk
And a balanced view is good and I think you are right, public platforms should be cautious cos as has been mentioned rape and sexual assault is a very hard crime to convict on and if he is found innocent in a court of law then that is a very good basis to start suing left right and centre and then that will just give grist for the mill for some on here.I was just trying to give a balanced view,
I've got no defence for people who will defend him if he is convicted,and these people should be rightly called out,
!?If he’s found guilty, will those openly supporting him both on here and in the media hold their hands up and condemn him? Or is rape in vogue nowedays?
I don't think any are openly supporting him? Just not agreeing with some of the actions taken before guilt is established?If he’s found guilty, will those openly supporting him both on here and in the media hold their hands up and condemn him? Or is rape in vogue nowedays?
People aren't defending the mantra Innocent until proven guilty. They are saying the mainstream media, big pharma and the government are out to silence him because he has unearthed the truth.What if he is found innocent are you going to still call him a Rapist.
I personally can't stand the bloke and if he is guilty he should go away for a long time.
But I believe people are defending, the mantra Innocent until proven Guilty.
Anyone still defending a convicted rapist if that be the case, should be called out and shamed.
You would hope any right minded person would completely disassociate themselves from him if he was convicted.
Ah well, Ive got nee time for any of thatPeople aren't defending the mantra Innocent until proven guilty. They are saying the mainstream media, big pharma and the government are out to silence him because he has unearthed the truth.