Scotty 1978
Striker
He didn’t have a pre season last time he signed, he’ll be naturally fit and ready to go
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Happy to be appeased.I think it will be a total disaster. It smells of making a signing that appeases the fans. Doesn't fit the structure or model at all.
An older player on a free fits the model perfectly.I think it will be a total disaster. It smells of making a signing that appeases the fans. Doesn't fit the structure or model at all.
Only 19 games left of the season. If we sign him and he takes 6 games to get match fit. Huge argument to say what is the point.
Agree on the DM, we have needed one all season.Happy to be appeased.
We need a DM.
If you don't think it fits the model then you dont understand what it is. They've never shied away from signing players who are 25+. They've signed loads, they're just always free transfers. This kind of signing is exactly what they said they would do.I think it will be a total disaster. It smells of making a signing that appeases the fans. Doesn't fit the structure or model at all.
Missing my point. He won't be match fit so let's say there is 5/6 games you lose him playing assume he plays u21 games to get some fitness. Leaves 12 games of the season left if we are adrift by then, big argument to say it is a waste of a signing.Aye what’s the point in signing someone who’d improve our midfield when there’s 39 points to play for?
Who are we going to sign that has been playing regular first team football? Who was the last one even?Missing my point. He won't be match fit so let's say there is 5/6 games you lose him playing assume he plays u21 games to get some fitness. Leaves 12 games of the season left if we are adrift by then, big argument to say it is a waste of a signing.
The model is based around signing and developing players for future sales. Mvilla doesn't fit that window. Hence why they want rid of Pritchard and Batth. All players with no re-sale value.If you don't think it fits the model then you dont understand what it is. They've never shied away from signing players who are 25+. They've signed loads, they're just always free transfers. This kind of signing is exactly what they said they would do.
Who are we going to sign that has been playing regular first team football? Who was the last one even?
Not a scooby.Who are we going to sign that has been playing regular first team football? Who was the last one even?
Dack, the previous windowThe model is based around signing and developing players for future sales. Mvilla doesn't fit that window. Hence why they want rid of Pritchard and Batth. All players with no re-sale value.
Also when was the last player we signed over the age of 25?
Therefore it isn’t much of an issueNot a scooby.
I’m not interested in debating this - I’m all in with both feet.
But.
Is it happening?
Mowbray signing. He wanted experience and was cheap.Dack, the previous window![]()
Huge argument we might have him for 6 partial games then have him available for 13 full matches and say that's miles better than what we have now.Only 19 games left of the season. If we sign him and he takes 6 games to get match fit. Huge argument to say what is the point.
What?Therefore it isn’t much of an issue