• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Yann M'vila - target or not?

everstar said:
He played the full 90 minutes in his last two games for Olympiacos in two 1-0 wins against PAOK and Panathinaikos.

The previous game he played 90 minutes in a game which finished 0-0 with AEK Athens who won the league. 3 days earlier he played 68 minutes in a 5-0 win (he was subbed after they went 5-0 up) against the team which finished 6th.

He has been posting on instagram showing he has been continuing training. Get the fucker in.
Click to expand...
100% this.

People dying for Cory evens to get back having not played for months, been badly injured and played his best games in league 1 !
 

Buzzing to sign him me. Quality player.
craigypants said:
He isn't coming so move on and stop yer dreaming...face reality. We gonna get some loan from a Prem club, 19 years old and then we find out he's another number 10 and not a defensive midfielder. Start of the season I said top two, after ten games I said play-offs. Now I reckon 10th.
Click to expand...
Ah well, he’s shite anyways.
 
If the club are signing him purely down to him being a fans favourite and actually reading the room for once we are generally fucked as good as he was 7 years ago of whatever it was.

Not a hope in hell they'd even look at him if he wasn't popular amongst the fans, if they are actually looking at him anyway. The so called model would of went into meltdown when it hit the age check.

That being said if he's even got 50% of his old talent he'll be in our starting line up.
 
Last edited:
Safc98 said:
When was the last time he played
Click to expand...

14th May. Much less of a lay off than some of our injured players last year. It’s not like he wasn’t playing every minute or every game for his last club. He said he needed a bit of a rest after playing 140 games in 3 seasons. Might find that this rest has done him a world of good and allows him to play on to 38.
 
SunderLad92 said:
If the club are signing him purely down to him being a fans favourite and actually reading the room for once we are generally fucked as good as he was 7 years ago of whatever it was.

Not a hope in hell they'd even look at him if he wasn't popular amongst the fans, if they are actually looking at him anyway. The so called model would of went into meltdown when it hit the age check.
Click to expand...
Another one who doesn't understand the model.
 
SunderLad92 said:
If the club are signing him purely down to him being a fans favourite and actually reading the room for once we are generally fucked as good as he was 7 years ago of whatever it was.

Not a hope in hell they'd even look at him if he wasn't popular amongst the fans, if they are actually looking at him anyway. The so called model would of went into meltdown when it hit the age check.

That being said if he's even got 50% of his old talent he'll be in our starting line up.
Click to expand...

The so called model of signing older players on a free? Why do people constantly spout shit like this?
 
ferryhill mackem said:
The so called model of signing older players on a free? Why do people constantly spout shit like this?
Click to expand...
Needs to be stickied and put at the top of the page


WE WILL SIGN OLDER PLAYERS BUT NOT PAY A FEE FOR THEM.
SunderLad92 said:
You had a full understanding of the model so far Rocky? I thought everyone assumed it was get them cheap or free and young and develop them for a profit. Or has that suddenly changed and you've always known?
Click to expand...
No you just don't understand it. Thats fine
You might learn something today
 
SunderLad92 said:
You had a full understanding of the model so far Rocky? I thought everyone assumed it was get them cheap or free and young and develop them for a profit. Or has that suddenly changed and you've always known?
Click to expand...
The other part of the model, is experienced older players on a free or minimal fee. Never changed.
 
Rocky77 said:
Needs to be stickied and put at the top of the page


WE WILL SIGN OLDER PLAYERS BUT NOT PAY A FEE FOR THEM.

No you just don't understand it. Thats fine
You might learn something today
Click to expand...

Brilliant response and no explanation of how many examples signing older players on a free so far this model has brung in since its been implemented 👍 but saying we'll sign anyone doesn't matter what age they are aslong as they are free covers all angles.... so there's no model then aslong as they are free ?
 
Roker Magic said:
Okay fair enough. But after he took over, Sam's win percentage was still worse than Poyet and O'Neil, who both got sacked. It was exactly the same as Bruce, who most people stag off. Also, Allardyce had a better win percentage when he managed Newcastle (where he got sacked) but i dont hear anyone ever say how good he was for them. We can make excuses for him as much as we like but ultimately the stats prove he wasn't actually that good.
Click to expand...
That’s what the stats show but if you look deeper it was a slow turn around building up to that late run with top 6 form.. His performance data management, player fitness and injury management takes time to impact individuals and the squad.. his signings helped too mind. I think a lot of us assume that if he had stayed that late season momentum would have carried on.. we’ll never know.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top