• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Would you have a go at playing

safcrob said:
4-4-2?

If it was upto you.

It worked for Forrest and at least it may give the defense a bit extra cover, then again it may be an absolute disaster. If not then what system would you like to see RLB try against wolves.
Click to expand...
Once safe I think we could have had a bit of an experiment. Brobbey defo need someone up alongside with a bit of pace and a goals instinct…
 

woodlebert said:
we do it loads. two banks of 4 and one of the midfielders joining the striker.

lots of teams do, it's a very popular defensive shape
Click to expand...
You said we've done it in pretty much every game, wouldn't say that at all, earlier in the season we were playing with a back 5 and sometimes not even leaving a striker up top. We've defended with 11 men behind the ball alot
 
robbied2 said:
You said we've done it in pretty much every game, wouldn't say that at all, earlier in the season we were playing with a back 5 and sometimes not even leaving a striker up top. We've defended with 11 men behind the ball alot
Click to expand...
yes we have. you can do it with a 5-4-1 as well. indeed we often defend with 5-4-1 and 4-4-2 in the same game

all the bit in bold can be done with a 4-4-2, yes

we probably disagree on "pretty much every game" which likely isn't worth debating. the point is the same really
 
woodlebert said:
yes we have. you can do it with a 5-4-1 as well. indeed we often defend with 5-4-1 and 4-4-2 in the same game

all the bit in bold can be done with a 4-4-2, yes

we probably disagree on "pretty much every game" which likely isn't worth debating. the point is the same really
Click to expand...
:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top