• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

WMS Who Owns Sunderland AFC?

Status
Not open for further replies.

I think that's what hes alluding to KLD doesn't have a controlling stake just has more shares than anybody else.
Then wouldn’t it be strange that he announced he did have a controlling stake.

If you don’t believe that is true, why would you believe him if he said he had 68.5% of the shares?
 
Then wouldn’t it be strange that he announced he did have a controlling stake.

If you don’t believe that is true, why would you believe him if he said he had 68.5% of the shares?
I tend to take people on face value until proven otherwise if kld has said he has a majority stake i think he has 51%at least ..If however it turns out he hasnt and has just done some sort of voting rights deal with Donald so he has a majority on the board.. ..well he can fekk ofsky.
I just don't get the secrecy!
 
Davison is COO and a director of SAFC. He won't have been privy to any detail of the sale agreement between Madrox and the entity which bought the shares in Sunderland, because it has no bearing on his role as an employee of SAFC controlling day to day matters.

He literally read a statement he was given from the 'ownership group' which didn't mention an NDA once. I'm pretty sure the ownership grouop, who provided that statement, knew if they had one or not.

Wasn't until the next day the ownership realised they had an NDA.

The club was provided the question prior to the meeting.
 
I tend to take people on face value until proven otherwise if kld has said he has a majority stake i think he has 51%at least ..If however it turns out he hasnt and has just done some sort of voting rights deal with Donald so he has a majority on the board.. ..well he can fekk ofsky.
I just don't get the secrecy!
I think we’re focussing on the wrong things.

Do we really care what the percentages are, or do we care how much money is invested and how many games we win.

If SD can find more investment he’s welcome to use it to help us.
 
He literally read a statement he was given from the 'ownership group' which didn't mention an NDA once. I'm pretty sure the ownership grouop, who provided that statement, knew if they had one or not.

Wasn't until the next day the ownership realised they had an NDA.

The club was provided the question prior to the meeting.
Where does this go though??

If the club make an announcement with the percentages, it wouldn’t be enough.

We then demand evidence, which would then not be believed or some new conspiracy theory concocted.

What would be enough?
 
I think we’re focussing on the wrong things.

Do we really care what the percentages are, or do we care how much money is invested and how many games we win.

If SD can find more investment he’s welcome to use it to help us.
I want those moronic twats (donald methman and santi)out of our club yesterday! You focus on what you want and i will do the same and if it turns out KLD has been lying to us well you can guess the rest.
 
Where does this go though??

If the club make an announcement with the percentages, it wouldn’t be enough.

We then demand evidence, which would then not be believed or some new conspiracy theory concocted.

What would be enough?

Can't answer this. I've got an NDA in place.

Pointless to keep asking really.

I think that's how it works anyway.
 
Last edited:
Then you don’t understand how businesses work.

Are you suggesting a billionaire from a family of billionaires has invested into our club without ensuring he can invest further?

And are you also suggesting that the minority shareholders don’t want KLD to invest despite the fact that it could increase the value of their holdings by doing so?

The story was written to stir up shit, that’s what I cannot understand.
Well of course I'm not.

And re. para above I don't know what stake kyril has so it's hard to know how much of an expectation there would have been from him to invest.

He was big on singing the merits of self sufficiency when he got involved. But circumstances change.

And that is a very random way of stiring shit up by claiming the owner is going to spend money on the pitch just after he's taken over. Club could have easily denied it like rather than have Johnson talking about the having had chats about improving the pitch.
 
I want those moronic twats (donald methman and santi)out of our club yesterday! You focus on what you want and i will do the same and if it turns out KLD has been lying to us well you can guess the rest.
What’s Santori done wrong?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top