• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Which baboon thought it was a good idea to impose a 40% pay cut

Status
Not open for further replies.

Why not state they can have the lot back, for one clean sheet, one at least home win and once scoring first at home?

Three huge unrealistic targets I expect safc to achieve by 2018.

I do pile the pressure on though
 
:lol:

It's true disabled have had their income cut by 40%. It's denied etc etc, but it's happening.

Of course this is not the thread but it does not make it less true.

As for fiasco. I've had plenty of PM's, stating the resemblance was uncanny.

You chose a piss take route, fair enough.
I admit that he looks like him.

Was just funny

It certainly wasn't a good idea. Or do think its working in the best interests of the club and supporters?
Of course it was!
 
For relegation and in the event of a relegation thought it would be all the motivation the players needed?
It was something Quinny introduced on all new contracts if they were relegated then their pay would be cut.
The time it should have motivated them was last season.
 
if you're suggesting they're putting in 40% less effort due to the wage cut, here's an idea: Cut their wage by 100%. Aye, they'll give no effort at all, but no f*cking change there...and we'll save some more money in the process!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top