• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Three wins

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bittermackems
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ha, fuckin love a smug hull fan thinking he's above us. What a
Why do fans of other teams feel the need to read this board, then sign up and start posting? It's canny sad like.
totally agree. I think it's sad as fuck. I wouldn't dream of signing up to another teams board just to try and wind them up. I honestly don't know what they get from it...[DOUBLEPOST=1394450406][/DOUBLEPOST]
Sorry mate, but no one on here gives a shit about Hull Tigers. The reason why he have Hull threads is purely down to that twat you have as a manager - it's nothing to do with your club.

Please however do stick with this forum because in 12mths time we can discuss the mess Steve Bruce has made at Hull Tigers and how the shit players he signed to get you to the next level are now a financial noose around your clubs neck.

Like many of us when Bruce was manager of our club, you will ignore the above and foolishly believe things will be different. We laughed at Birmingham fans when they tried to warn us.
Spot on post. Op needs to enjoy it now but also take heed of this..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Not particularly. Up nice and early with a slight hangover, and curiosity over your high levels of bitterness got the better of me. Sometimes the other side is better, it is OK to admit it. I do think if you had Johnson and Borini on from the start you might have done a bit better but they hardly set the game alive when they came on.
Did you actually see some of the refereeing decisions?
And you're a bunch of cheating diving bastards trying to get Cattermole sent off.
And your ground's shit.
And Hull f***ing stinks!
 
Followed this forum for a while and can't help but notice how bitter the majority of you are about Hull. You wanted to play us with 11 men and apparently you would demolish us. Well, that happened eh. Was just wondering if you might all accept that we are better now that we put it to bed yesterday. Or are the six changes the excuse this time?
Expect a few visits on your own forum when you get beat in the semi or final because you haven't got a chance in hell of winning the cup, i'll look forward to seeing you at your forum, I'll even give you the heads up my name will be Tigershite.
 
Expect a few visits on your own forum when you get beat in the semi or final because you haven't got a chance in hell of winning the cup, i'll look forward to seeing you at your forum, I'll even give you the heads up my name will be Tigershite.

That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.
 
That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.

Nobody saw our team selection coming so we were rightly bullish. Had you told any SAFC fan that Mannone, Brown, Alonso, Bridcutt, Ki, Johnson, Borini were all going to be "rested" then we may well have not been so expectant. That's why we are annoyed with the manager - see the massive threads on the front page for further info.
 
Dont mind admitting Hull are clearly better than us - for now.

Only a matter of time before a squad with shite like Rosenior, McShane etc in it stops overperforming. Especially with the master of short term "success" and long term failure in charge.
 
Dont mind admitting Hull are clearly better than us - for now.

Only a matter of time before a squad with shite like Rosenior, McShane etc in it stops overperforming. Especially with the master of short term "success" and long term failure in charge.

I wouldn't say clearly better. They're 6 points ahead of us, we have two games in hand.

They've beaten us twice in the league this season, neither game have we had 11 men for most of the match. If we'd have one one of those games we'd have the same amount of points as they do now (and still two games in hand).
 
Followed this forum for a while and can't help but notice how bitter the majority of you are about Hull. You wanted to play us with 11 men and apparently you would demolish us. Well, that happened eh. Was just wondering if you might all accept that we are better now that we put it to bed yesterday. Or are the six changes the excuse this time?
Do you partake in the 'mauled' chant? You f***ing embarrassment.
 
That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.

Bitter? Shut the fuck up man.

Come back when your shitty little club have even won half of what we have. Who the fuck does this idiot think he is? :-D
 
Followed this forum for a while and can't help but notice how bitter the majority of you are about Hull. You wanted to play us with 11 men and apparently you would demolish us. Well, that happened eh. Was just wondering if you might all accept that we are better now that we put it to bed yesterday. Or are the six changes the excuse this time?
You made an account just to gloat??

FO; KY
 
That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.
Did you read kauto stars post. It's absolutely spot on
 
Followed this forum for a while and can't help but notice how bitter the majority of you are about Hull. You wanted to play us with 11 men and apparently you would demolish us. Well, that happened eh. Was just wondering if you might all accept that we are better now that we put it to bed yesterday. Or are the six changes the excuse this time?

Go and do your gay mauled by the tigers song.

Hull Tigers fc lol
 
That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.
You not got graft you should be doing this morning instead of spending the last 5 hours on another team's messageboard? What an utter tool :lol:
 
That's ambitious to say the least. Aren't your games in hand within a week of each other?

Also, has nobody on here considered for one moment you may have been better off not sacking Bruce, been downhill since with a series of rubbish managers

I have no problem with losing to teams. Thats football. It doesnt automatically make you a better side overall (for example, we've beaten Man City this season and the Mags twice - we arent a better side though overall). We are down near the bottom for a good reason. Despite the improvement under Poyet, he has very limited options in the current squad.

As for Bruce - Gardner £6m, Wickham £8m, Larrson free on big wages, Cattermole £6m..... just a few of the reasons why Bruce got the boot (quite rightly), and just a few of the reasons why you should be wondering where things will go
 
That's different to my motive. I came on here cos you're a set of bitter fools who can't take losing to Hull. But you were gonna demolish us in the quarter final with 11 men on the pitch. Worked didn't it.

Edit: Regardless of sendings off/back passes, if Sunderland beat Hull three times in one season I'd admit Sunderland were better.
I'd be more worried about your own club if I was you because I believe your owners have no cash left, they said this on TV yesterday and there won't be much investment that is why they are exploiting advertising "tigers". You've had a good season this year I will give you that but don't expect it to be the same time after time, enjoy it while it lasts.
 
Hip are without doubt a very side ATM.

What @Bittermackems is missing however. Is our dreadful first 8 games under a manager without a clue. Take it since then and we probably have more points than hull.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top