• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.

Reiver said:
OK, once again please bear in mind that whatever I post will be seen.

It's my own personal opinion that it's not the cost of sacking Ross that's the problem.

Think back to Newcastle, Bruce and Sheff Wed.

That's all I can say.
Click to expand...
Fair play to you through all of this and I hope none of your updates come back to bite you. So far it seems like the media is playing catch up to you for the past few days. Exciting times ahead (hopefully)
 
garyswc said:
These fellas are each individually registered with and regulated by the US Federal Security and Exchange Commission ("Sec"). The ongoing review and scrutiny of registered investment advisors in particular the rules and tests regarding Felons and Bad Actors are way, way beyond rigorous. They were extreme in any case but post crash/Lehmans etc are now pretty scary as are the penalties for improper behaviour. Federal law prison sentences for beaching rules and mis guiding investors are typically 40+ years. It is impossible to imagine the MSD partners will do anything other than sail straight through our football regulator's fit and proper tests. Additionally all of the information will have been available to the football authorities and the click of a mouse, such is the absolutely routine nature of providing such data to vendors, acquirers, lenders and all of their associated advisors. Pretty much every new transaction they enter will require their past, current and future integrated financials + a multitude of other documentation. Said data will be kept permanently up to date by a small army of accountants and lawyers not least to be able to file the necessary quarterly returns to the SEC but also to perform the day to day transactions of their business.
Click to expand...
There's a $100m dollar question in there somewhere....
 
Reiver said:
OK, once again please bear in mind that whatever I post will be seen.

It's my own personal opinion that it's not the cost of sacking Ross that's the problem.

Think back to Newcastle, Bruce and Sheff Wed.

That's all I can say.
Click to expand...

Best not be getting him back.
 
Spaceturtle said:
I seem to remember that somebody on here mentioned Michael Dell just before Donald took us over. I remember because I googled Dell at the time and thought it would be a dream come true. Anyone else remember that?
Click to expand...
Did your google find anything "interesting"?
 
Reiver said:
OK, once again please bear in mind that whatever I post will be seen.

It's my own personal opinion that it's not the cost of sacking Ross that's the problem.

Think back to Newcastle, Bruce and Sheff Wed.

That's all I can say.
Click to expand...

Man City not playing ball with Pep then...

Arabs clearly pissed off that we have more money.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top