• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Takeover News/Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.
Grumpy Old Man said:
What I'm meaning is that there would be little or no point in asking when he's leaving. More realistic to question what role he would be intended to take, and express some reservations if the answer is concerning. Because they wouldn't be about to reply "some time next week".
Click to expand...
My personal opinion is that I would like us as fans, to register our discontentment with his potential involvement, regardless of role. I appreciate he's not going to be instantly dismissed, but I would like it to be clear that he's not welcome.
 

sick said:
My personal opinion is that I would like us as fans, to register our discontentment with his potential involvement, regardless of role. I appreciate he's not going to be instantly dismissed, but I would like it to be clear that he's not welcome.
Click to expand...
Bang on. Put pressure on straight away. We already have his pal Rodwell at the club and he’ll stay anarl. Jobs for the boys.
 
sick said:
My personal opinion is that I would like us as fans, to register our discontentment with his potential involvement, regardless of role. I appreciate he's not going to be instantly dismissed, but I would like it to be clear that he's not welcome.
Click to expand...

I don't see why he can't be instantly dismissed, he has failed miserably and he has done it while trying to con the fans. Can't get worse than that.
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
If he does come back, it will be because the new owners, including Dreyfus, want him. Cutting up rough won't change that.
Click to expand...

I think on day one if there's a huge push back from the fanbase he may be forced to take a back seat.

I think it'd be pretty easy to make the case that not only has he failed on a professional level, he's also completely lost any trust in the fanbase with his divisive and downright disrespectful comments. We won't forgive him, he's got to go.
 
Last edited:
scott934 said:
I don't see why he can't be instantly dismissed, he has failed miserably and he has done it while trying to con the fans. Can't get worse than that.
Click to expand...
Could I suppose, but as @Grumpy Old Man points out, if he is given a role it's because the new owner likes him so may be reluctant to bin him on the first day. On the other hand as @Nelson! says, a fan revolt may change his mind, you would think that he'd want to avoid getting off on the wrong foot with us.
 
Last edited:
Grumpy Old Man said:
If he does come back, it will be because the new owners, including Dreyfus, want him. Cutting up rough won't change that.
Click to expand...
If charlie gets the jimmy hill welcome everywhere he goes in safc land .. I cannot see how he can continue as a front line representative for safc............. I dislike the fella with a passion and if he is involved with our club in any way above teaboy or long forgotten minority shareholder it will tarnish our club and the respect i have for the new ownership......... The problem at the heart of the matter they hold our support and people of the north east in such contempt that is that they think we are so stupid that a few wins and we will welcome them back with open arms.How wrong they are and the quicker we let the fekkers know this the better.
Johnsafc said:
Bang on. Put pressure on straight away. We already have his pal Rodwell at the club and he’ll stay anarl. Jobs for the boys.
Click to expand...
Perhaps ALS could produce a new T shirt with the fekkers slimy face on it with a stop sign stating "Say NO to Charlie". This combines an anti drug message with vermin control
 
Last edited:
sick said:
Can't see it mentioned but sorry if seb. Just listening to WMS pod and they reckon they've heard Methven is going to be making a return after the re-shuffle.
Click to expand...
I get the impression that satori and methven have had enough of Donald and his amateurish behaviour.
 
MikeSAFC said:
I get the impression that satori and methven have had enough of Donald and his amateurish behaviour.
Click to expand...

Here, its not like the pair of them can be obsolved from any blame. Sartori turned up a few times, wore the t-shirt, then got bored and was never to be seen again, and Charlie decided he'd had enough of mingling with us low lifes and started putting the boot in because we didn't appreciate his, or Donald's piss poor effort at running a club.

Its a huge worry that these still could have a massive say in how the club is run, especially if they think they've done a good job of it till now.
 
sick said:
Could I suppose, but as @Grumpy Old Man points out, if he is given a role it's because the new owner likes him so may be reluctant to bin him on the first day. On the other hand as @Nelson! says, a fan revolt may change his mind, you would think that he'd want to avoid getting off on the wrong foot with us.
Click to expand...

If the new owner gives him a role we need to take action, because that is not a takeover, if anything it's a renewal of the current ownership. We need to be totally free of the incompetence of the Oxford 2. Silent shareholders at most.
 
scott934 said:
If the new owner gives him a role we need to take action, because that is not a takeover, if anything it's a renewal of the current ownership. We need to be totally free of the incompetence of the Oxford 2. Silent shareholders at most.
Click to expand...

This is absolutely right. We need to re-establish some sort of supporter agency over the club. Donald and Methven having anything more than a sleeping shareholding should be off the table.
 
scott934 said:
If the new owner gives him a role we need to take action, because that is not a takeover, if anything it's a renewal of the current ownership. We need to be totally free of the incompetence of the Oxford 2. Silent shareholders at most.
Click to expand...
I haven't' read the full thread and it may have already been mentioned but perhaps we should buy the banners off the Anti-Vaccine movement once they are finished with them.

"We don't want the 2 Oxford pricks".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top