Mackem Tommy
Striker
Cans at 4:00pm
One of these days
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cans at 4:00pm
I missed this all weekend doing the C2C. What's happened exactly?
can someone summarise what nick Barnes said pre match as i missed the fucker?
who is actually rumoured to be the front runners in this thing..
nick barnes gave an update pre match about the takeover and a striker but ive nee idea about wither as i was out myself
As in takeover or reshuffle?He just said its progressing well. End of the month completion. About to be submitted to EFL
TakeoverAs in takeover or reshuffle?
Like I said he gains nothing from making a story upThe bloke has made up loads of stuff it’s not out of reach to think he’s told Barnes he has a preferred bidder he’s talking to exclusively. That’s all that’s been said. The rest is conjecture and hearsay from here and 606. He hasn’t masterminded some huge conspiracy he just had to say one sentence
Cough coughGary Bennett also asked if Barnes knew who the buyers were and he said no
I’m not saying whether he has or hasn’t but he absolutely does. Where’s the anger and unrest from a few weeks back? Where’s the organised effort to starve him of streaming or shirt sales? Regardless of whether he’s made something up or not it’s undoubtedly better for him to have us all talking about takeovers instead of his ineptitudeLike I said he gains nothing from making a story up
There wouldn't of been a organised effort of starving him of shirt sales regardless if there was takeover talk or not. I have to disagree it serves him no purpose at all to make up a takeover over rumourI’m not saying whether he has or hasn’t but he absolutely does. Where’s the anger and unrest from a few weeks back? Where’s the organised effort to starve him of streaming or shirt sales? Regardless of whether he’s made something up or not it’s undoubtedly better for him to have us all talking about takeovers instead of his ineptitude
agreed, its more of a personal point of view with him. SD is very much reactionary, he doesn't have a proactive footballing brain. If it falls through, and he has to take some crap, he will deal with it thenI’m not saying whether he has or hasn’t but he absolutely does. Where’s the anger and unrest from a few weeks back? Where’s the organised effort to starve him of streaming or shirt sales? Regardless of whether he’s made something up or not it’s undoubtedly better for him to have us all talking about takeovers instead of his ineptitude
Well do you not think most of them were respecting the wishes of their individual sources....? you know, just possibly like? If someone told me something in confidence and said "don't mention any names", I wouldn't mention any names. Weird isn't it...?Seems strange that all the ITKs said nothing about a takeover until Barnes' tweet.
Then none of the ITKs said O'Brien was involved until this mysterious whatapp post and now all of a sudden they are saying they knew about O'Brien's involvement all along.
Well it’s not full of banned posters from here that’s for sure. It’s full of calmer posters I would say, though it would be true to say that a fair few posters over there have had a run in with one mod on here.
The mod in question is responsible for a lot of good posters moving over unfortunately.
Like I say, I post on both until my next ban![]()
Except the same ITK gave the exact share breakdown without including O'Brien, they only ever mention 3 people, if they knew O'Brien was involved where did he appear in the share distribution and if they really knew and didn't want to include him they could have mentioned a 4th unamed person.Well do you not think most of them were respecting the wishes of their individual sources....? you know, just possibly like? If someone told me something in confidence and said "don't mention any names", I wouldn't mention any names. Weird isn't it...?![]()
Which would all be well and good if they hadnt named three other people and the individual percentages of ownership that were supposedly involved. Bit strange if Gordon or Nath were the only names that couldnt be mentioned given they' aren't even taking a shareWell do you not think most of them were respecting the wishes of their individual sources....? you know, just possibly like? If someone told me something in confidence and said "don't mention any names", I wouldn't mention any names. Weird isn't it...?![]()
Hi Berb thoo knaars? Thoo knaars nowt.Easy to say when you know Bobs not around anymore, but really pathetic
Lot of knaaaring and not knaaaring gannin on here.
Lot of Bob bashing anarl just cos he is not here.
Lot of changes since that original post, as things do when deals are needing to be done.
Lot of things are happening like and changes are afoot.
People who are really in the knaaar are keeping it tight as it should be.
So anyone on here posting stuff pretending they knaar are tinkers.
Those of us who knaaar Bob knaar only so much as he cannont pass on his full knaaarings just yet.
Why is everyone obsessed with "itks"?Seems strange that all the ITKs said nothing about a takeover until Barnes' tweet.
Then none of the ITKs said O'Brien was involved until this mysterious whatapp post and now all of a sudden they are saying they knew about O'Brien's involvement all along.
Of course they will use the old ITK excuse of 'things change'