• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Stokes v Woakes

Status
Not open for further replies.
chunkylover53 said:
Probably in better form with the bat mind!
Click to expand...
Talk about hedging your bets!

I would classify them as Woakes as a batter who can bowl a bit.Stokes is a bowler who can bat a bit.Is there room for both of them?Time will tell.
 

smoker said:
Bowlers who can bat are being deliberately picked to cover for the pisspoor state of English batting. In the previous test lineup, only Anderson and Plunkett (who has scored a ton for the lions) have not scored a test hundred.

Likewise, ask why Jos Buttler has been fast-tracked into the England team ahead of excellent glovesmen like James Foster and Tim Ambrose?
Click to expand...

Because Buttler is the future he is going to be a class act
 
Suprised Stokes has been ditched. His bowling alone has been no worse than that of the other 3 seamers.

This insistance that we HAVE to bat down to 10 is utter crap
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top