• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Southampton spying compendium thread


Thornton said:
I know. I'll try Grok now.....

Coventry City — 95 pts
Ipswich Town — 81 pts (adjusted from 84)
Millwall — 80 pts (adjusted from 83)
Middlesbrough — 77–78 pts (adjusted from 80)
Hull City — ~70 pts (adjusted from original)
Wrexham — ~68–69 pts
Derby County — ~66–68 pts
Norwich City — ~62–64 pts
Birmingham City — ~61–63 pts
Swansea City — ~61–62 pts (adjusted from ~64)
Bristol City — ~59–60 pts
Sheffield United — ~57–58 pts
Preston North End — ~57–58 pts
Queens Park Rangers — ~55–56 pts
Watford — ~54–55 pts
Stoke City — ~52–53 pts
Portsmouth — ~52–53 pts
Charlton Athletic — ~50–51 pts
Blackburn Rovers — ~49–50 pts
West Bromwich Albion — ~48–49 pts (after original deductions)
Oxford United — ~44–45 pts
Leicester City — ~43–44 pts (after deductions)
Sheffield Wednesday — ~0–6 pts (after heavy deductions)
Southampton — 0 pts

It seems the whole situation has AI flummoxed too!
Click to expand...
I get this with ChatGPT after giving it the results matrix from wiki. I haven't checked it though 🤪

Logon or register to see this image
 
Few things I also think need to happen
The manager needs to be banned from football
They should be made to share all analytical data to see what other teams it has affected
double barrled bellend should get a hefty fine and ban.
c032745y said:
An argument would be "why did they do it?"
Click to expand...
Not a hard one to answer because their manager is a cheating bellend. Attempting to gain an advantage and should be rightfully sacked and banned.
 
Last edited:
Morny said:
People aren't half desperate to twist some kind of narrative that Boro shouldn't get Southampton's place in the final.

Not that football fans are git biased like :lol:
Click to expand...

Think the vast majority are pro being in the final. Personally I just think its entirely unfair on Hull.

Hope they take the efls cash for the game regardless of going up or not.
 
mackem1989 said:
Few things I also think need to happen
The manager needs to be banned from football
Click to expand...

I asked Google AI "Is Tonda Eckert in trouble?"


Response:

Yes, Southampton manager Tonda Eckert is in serious trouble. He is at the center of an English football "Spygate" scandal after admitting responsibility for sending staff to illegally film opponents' training sessions (including Middlesbrough, Oxford United, and Ipswich Town
 
123SunTan said:
I asked Google AI "Is Tonda Eckert in trouble?"


Response:

Yes, Southampton manager Tonda Eckert is in serious trouble. He is at the center of an English football "Spygate" scandal after admitting responsibility for sending staff to illegally film opponents' training sessions (including Middlesbrough, Oxford United, and Ipswich Town
Click to expand...
That's the sort of insight only technology can provide.
 
Flavonoids said:
That's the sort of insight only technology can provide.
Click to expand...

And that technology's assessment of Hull's case for automatic promotion (instead of having to play Boro):

No, Hull City is not being given automatic promotion. Despite their lawyers aggressively arguing that they should bypass the match, the English Football League (EFL) has ruled that Middlesbrough will replace Southampton in the Championship play-off final at Wembley Stadium
 
Flavonoids said:
To gain an advantage ... but it is fair to say we don't know if they did, and it can't be proven that it's the reason Southampton won, it also can't be disproven. Fortunately, it's irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Same rationale applies to every drug cheat, financial cheat etc etc. Ben Johnson might've won the 100m anyway, why take the gold medal off him?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top