• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

SoL To Undergo Multi-Million-Pound Investment Programme


To be fair they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

If they put the news out of a £35 increase or whatever with no improvements people would be complaining about paying more when the stadium isn’t being kept up to standard
So will they start immediately ? Or is this just to justify a ST price increase ?
 
Aye, you'd expect the investments to be released in the supporters collective minutes. The fact they've put them out today, which just happens to coincide with season ticket renewals, must be calculated. Which is fine by me tbh, if they've got something positive to share, get it out there. As long as it happens, it's good, and it's not the end of them improving
are we gonna see anything from the meeting this week mate?
 
So if you're the owner of a club, Co or not, you can't speak on behalf of the club you own? Strange take.
charltons view is he isnt a representative or spekesman of them because he isnt a director so doesnt determine the club view on things..directors run businesses...
They have 30 owners..what if they all have doifferent views..which of them is speaking "on behalf of the club"

Lets use a football analogy..clubs appoint captains to speak on behalf of the players...so when the caprain speaks..he is supposed to re[present the public voice of the players..
if the resevre left back speaks..why would he be the public voice of the players?
 
charltons view is he isnt a representative or spekesman of them because he isnt a director so doesnt determine the club view on things..directors run businesses...
They have 30 owners..what if they all have doifferent views..which of them is speaking "on behalf of the club"

Lets use a football analogy..clubs appoint captains to speak on behalf of the players...so when the caprain speaks..he is supposed to re[present the public voice of the players..
if the resevre left back speaks..why would he be the public voice of the players?
You're making stuff up and it's getting late. Take it easy.
 
charltons view is he isnt a representative or spekesman of them because he isnt a director so doesnt determine the club view on things..directors run businesses...
They have 30 owners..what if they all have doifferent views..which of them is speaking "on behalf of the club"

Lets use a football analogy..clubs appoint captains to speak on behalf of the players...so when the caprain speaks..he is supposed to re[present the public voice of the players..
if the resevre left back speaks..why would he be the public voice of the players?
Yet whenever anyone speaks about Charlton, it’s him, and always with the title “owner”
 
You're making stuff up and it's getting late. Take it easy.
sigh..if you cant rebut a point just admit it rather than trying to gas light people..
its only a message board..its not real life...this place doesnt matter and is a safe space from your the inadequacies that cause you to gas light people in real life..here there is no need to..just slink off to another thread and carry on there..
 
sigh..if you cant rebut a point just admit it rather than trying to gas light people..
its only a message board..its not real life...this place doesnt matter and is a safe space from your the inadequacies that cause you to gas light people in real life..here there is no need to..just slink off to another thread and carry on there..
Suggest you look up the meaning of Gaslighting marra, your reply in the context of mine makes no sense.
 
Back
Top