viccarlton
Striker
Which places them where in the league table of competency?they did..they just provided us with a manger not capable of doing it in jack ross.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which places them where in the league table of competency?they did..they just provided us with a manger not capable of doing it in jack ross.
the plan 18 month ago was to get the club financially stable while also spending more than all our rivals put together..they did that
they need to clera this up..but it looks like a loan to madrox (ie not to sunderland so sunderland not laible for the debt) that can be conbveretd to shares later..They are not telling us much. Is it a loan? They haven't bought a share so how do they get their money back? How is it an investment for them?
Stewart Donald said we didn't need anybody's investment to get out of League 1.
on the football side? very low down..Which places them where in the league table of competency?
but they have a squad of never have beens..they have a squad of people who have literally done it! at this level!I thought the plan was to rebuild a football club from top to bottom with long term aims? To make the recruitment smarter, the academy more productive and end the ‘piss taking party’?
To me, we have a squad packed full of never have been, never will be and are unlikely to ever be players that are the wrong side of 25. There have been substantial sums (for this level) paid on a couple of them as you mentioned.
I think it’s a reasonable question to ask why have the academy and scouting networks been existing on a skeleton staff when Donald has been telling us we’re the best financially organised club in the football league (also that we had data analysts and a scouting system when asked in a podcast), that we have considerably the biggest budget that teams in the division above wouldn’t be able to compete with and are now having to rely on outside investment (18 months down the line) to basically get us on an even keel in terms of club infrastructure again?
The tune changes quite a lot. It’s admirable that they realise it needs development but don’t try and pull the wool here.
It's exactly what they detailed when they first arrived man! They said "the pisstake party stops here" and detailed the ways the club were wasting money including scouts taking the piss with their expenditures. They always said they'd be looking to bring in more investors in the future and that more money would be spent on the club later.
I've seen no evidence at all that either of CM or SD are "bullshitters" as you put it. All I see is a couple of guys rebuilding our club in the manner they always said they would.
Promotion may well have take a season (or possibly two) more than they and we had hoped, but the rest of the plan appears to me to be still in place. Bring it on! Stage 2!
"Not liable for debt" not entirely sure, the Parachute Payments scenario is evidence that we probably are.they need to clera this up..but it looks like a loan to madrox (ie not to sunderland so sunderland not laible for the debt) that can be conbveretd to shares later..
companies hosue filings will reveal all..when they are ade..which will be soon..
I've see a lot of folks on here go off the deep end about things that could be taken a number of ways, such as use of the word "budget" in the early interviews when a lot of people assumed he meant "transfer fee budget". It's not the only example of a lot of people getting the wrong end of the stick and then getting angry that this "promise" they'd invented in their own heads wasn't fulfilled. The "100 points" controversy was another main offender, where loads of people missed the parts of the same paragraph where he said he was "aiming" for that total, not promising it. RAGE THAT WE'RE NOT LOOKING LIKE WE'RE GOING TO GET 100 POINTS!!!! RAGE THAT HE PROMISED IT, BECAUSE IF HE HADN'T PROMISED IT THEN WE WOULDN'T BE RAGING LIKE THIS ANYWAY, HONEST WE WOULDN'T!!!!
your completely right sout the 100 point thing..It was absolutely clear what Donald meant when he was talking about budget in the podcast when it was discussed. And it was absolutely to do with transfers and recruitment. Go back and listen to the podcast again, listen to the context and then maybe reassess.
And whilst the 100 point thing is being used as a stick to beat Donald with, he did indeed open himself up to that. Why would he do that to the manager? Why would he say it? Especially when we were clearly having to cut the wage bill and reduce the quality and depth of the squad to make us financially viable? It was a moment of absolute madness that made life incredibly difficult for the manager and raised expectation. It was as daft as Moyes and the ‘relegation battle’ comment.
The business world is beyond me, I look at our team and our position in the league (the lowest in our history) their worth as far as I’m concerned is in where our team is, at the moment we’re abysmal and this needs to be addressed with utmost importance, I couldn’t give a f#ck who owns the club and how much money they will make in the future (their main aim) all I want is a decent football team.on the football side? very low down..
on the business side..very high up..
american private equity frms buy businesses..thats why they want thes eguys to stay on..they are good at running safc as a business..thats what investos care about..
the owners have nott been clear//deliberately..is saying they have lied man! thats what !"dleiberately" means...they deliberately consciously chose not to tell us stuff or to obsfuscate!
cretin.
ellis short was a billioanire who saw us as good investment opportunity..
Why are you encouraging mods to ban people?The mods are going to have a field day with their banning button today
I f***ing wish I was one of them
Gerraway.we dont..this isnt for the first team now..did you not read the thing?