Side for the 2nd test then?

[MustardAndOnions]

He probably isn't fit but then they rolled out the vice-captain yesterday who more or less said he was fit.

Either way, agree with you on Stokes, it's putting pressure on the bowlers as we are effectively a 4 man attack now. I'd still always prefer a front line spinner however, even despite Lords traditionally being seamer friendly, and especially with recent injuries to Anderson/Robinson

He could probs make it through a game but just viewed as too big of a risk like I guess

Aye I tend to agree about spinner, always buys you a few wickets.

 

[Eggman]

We really need some runs from stokes then as I can’t imagine him bowling in the game now

Yep, head down, get some big runs and not give his wicket away.

 

[Hulkster]

Would have gone for Woakes personally.

 

[seaham ftm]

At least we won the first test.

 

[Aidan11]

If they weren't risking Wood they should have put Potts in.

Feel they've made a mistake here.

 

[MustardAndOnions]

If they weren't risking Wood they should have put Potts in.

Feel they've made a mistake here.

They need someit different