• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

SAFC Takeover Latest

Status
Not open for further replies.
JimmyQuinn said:
They also both said that ES would categorically not be seeing any of the club's parachute payment and that they'd be paying £40m for the club out of their own pockets. Truthfully we're better off waiting until proper documentation comes out as they appear to change their story whenever it suits.
Click to expand...
The elephant in the room!
oddbod said:
The parachute payments were use by don to guarantee that short would get the final payment of 15 million.Donald managed to pay off all the debt without using the parachute payments.i have no idea where this 15 million is but as others have said Donald intimated he would be paying it back but imho is being a tad shady about it !
Click to expand...
Where did you read or hear about about paying off the debt, did the chairman show you this info, the whole scenario is a grey area that needs clarifying fir the sake of transparency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

oddbod said:
Hi Roger i dont smoke so i aint going to blow smoke up your ar**.....but when you banned me for complaining how poor the mods were at communication with their patrons I thought you were being petulant and authoritarian.I now realise what a diffucult job you have controlling the mob!

Like many on her i joined not 606 to see what reiver (he was rightly banned imho for non footballing matters)had to say about the takeover and as soon as i started asking reiver about some of shall we say politely more wooly statements I was labelled a wum and banned.No communication whatsoever and whats worse every post i made was removed !Not that I suggest folk take a look to see what reiver is saying about posters on here but its an eyeopener but beware it a club for stepford wives/husbands ,tow the party line and dont make the mistake of challenging reiver or you will be replaced !

So respect for the job you do Roger allowing for the broad church of opinion and debate under difficult circumstances !
Click to expand...
How dare you question the resident ITK 😂
 
badlands said:
I don't want to put a spoke in the wheel here, but did Stuart Donald not say "we will know more in a week or two"?

Which doesn't necessarily mean that it will be COMPLETED in a week or two!

I personally really do not care WHEN as long as it DOES.
Click to expand...
You might be right, as long as it is going through, which no news you presume, until otherwise a couple of weeks a month or longer, as long as it goes through just like you say.
 
oddbod said:
Hi Roger i dont smoke so i aint going to blow smoke up your ar**.....but when you banned me for complaining how poor the mods were at communication with their patrons I thought you were being petulant and authoritarian.I now realise what a diffucult job you have controlling the mob!

Like many on her i joined not 606 to see what reiver (he was rightly banned imho for non footballing matters)had to say about the takeover and as soon as i started asking reiver about some of shall we say politely more wooly statements I was labelled a wum and banned.No communication whatsoever and whats worse every post i made was removed !Not that I suggest folk take a look to see what reiver is saying about posters on here but its an eyeopener but beware it a club for stepford wives/husbands ,tow the party line and dont make the mistake of challenging reiver or you will be replaced !

So respect for the job you do Roger allowing for the broad church of opinion and debate under difficult circumstances !
Click to expand...

To stop you being embarassed in future marra the expression is "toe the party line"
 
The Falcon said:
The elephant in the room!

Where did you read or hear about about paying off the debt, did the chairman show you this info, the whole scenario is a grey area that needs clarifying fir the sake of transparency.
Click to expand...
Clarifying and transparency for whose benefit?
 
bat said:
Clarifying and transparency for whose benefit?
Click to expand...
Good point, I’m sure i heard the transparency word when Donald took over,but as others have mentioned where’s this parachute payment gone? What you’re saying is they don’t have to answer to anyone is that it?
 
Quit with the conjecture. The time to make valid opinions is when the takeover takes place or not. This constant quibblng between posters is disheartening and achieves nothing. We all want the same thing so let this proposed takeover take its course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top