• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Regis


penno13 said:
Unfortunately that’s the turning point in our season for automatic promotion, all focus on maintaining a play off spot from now on
Click to expand...
Too early to say that as its only 18 game sin but we need to get back to winning ways and soon or we will find ourselves miles outside the top 3.
 
FifeMackem95 said:
Again, I get what you’re saying but if he does that and we lose control and get beat 3-0 then everyone’s giving him even bigger pelters, no?

I also want to see some gung-ho changes - I just get why he doesn’t do it. Doing what you’re saying might win it but it absolutely can also throw it all away too.
Click to expand...
Wilder and Sheff Utd went for it at 0-0 surely we could of went for it at 1 down no? Maybe just my preference but id rather see a mamager show some balls amd go for it
 
aupaalaves said:
Sheffield United went for it and won the game. The difference between playing safe and taking risks
Click to expand...
They brought on a centre mid in Tom Davies for a very productive attacking player on loan from Palace in Rak-Sakyi and a like for like change in One for Campbell.

That tells me that they made tactical changes that won it. Not by saying ‘let’s chuck the strikers on, surrender midfield control and hope something happens’
 
Salem Street South said:
Roberts shouldn’t have been playing, never mind taking penalties.

Agreed on O’Nien, but who’s decision is it to play him there, when Alese is on the bench.
Click to expand...
Why roberts is on penalties is baffling. A none scoring winger taking penalties wtaf

O9 at lb just unfathonable for me
 
The Hesk said:
Wilder and Sheff Utd went for it at 0-0 surely we could of went for it at 1 down no? Maybe just my preference but id rather see a mamager show some balls amd go for it
Click to expand...
FifeMackem95 said:
They brought on a centre mid in Tom Davies for a very productive attacking player on loan from Palace in Rak-Sakyi and a like for like change in One for Campbell.

That tells me that they made tactical changes that won it. Not by saying ‘let’s chuck the strikers on, surrender midfield control and hope something happens’
Click to expand...
Just quoting my post above to a similar response. Not as simple as saying ‘ha’way, chuck the strikers on’ as some are suggesting in my opinion
 
I’m not reading all of this.
He was a strange appointment, given his past record of more failure than success.
I M O he is a yes man, a friendly front for Speakman, Procter and Dodds to pull the strings.
He is probs earning more money than he ever has and his remit is to go out and face the press, say what he is told to say .
Meet the New Boss, same as the old Boss.
 
FifeMackem95 said:
Just quoting my post above to a similar response. Not as simple as saying ‘ha’way, chuck the strikers on’ as some are suggesting in my opinion
Click to expand...
Sheff utd 2 full backs basically played as wingers last 15 mins. Davies and Hamer both played as 2 number 10,s they went for it which helped us have a couple of attacks on the counter. We then brought Alese on put Hume in CM. Another baffling decision
 
allmagsaretossas said:
Of regis fully deserved in my opinion .
He's definitely got no plan b has not got a clue about subs and no coincidence we concede a lot of late goals cos of this scenario .
His honeymoon period is well and truly over . 1 goal in 5 games is very worrying
Click to expand...
Agree with this. When we cameout for the second half I couldnt believe he hadnt changed things.

He should have had a back 4 of Hume, Ballard, O nein, Alese. Midfield of Roberts, Jobe, Rigg, Watson.

Isidor up front.

Neil was awful and should have been off. I couldnt fathom out what the second half format was.
 
T_Bone said:
I’m not reading all of this.
He was a strange appointment, given his past record of more failure than success.
I M O he is a yes man, a friendly front for Speakman, Procter and Dodds to pull the strings.
He is probs earning more money than he ever has and his remit is to go out and face the press, say what he is told to say .
Meet the New Boss, same as the old Boss.
Click to expand...
We tried to bring in about 8 different coaches in the summer & all turned it down that tells you everything about the club
 
The Hesk said:
Sheff utd 2 full backs basically played as wingers last 15 mins. Davies and Hamer both played as 2 number 10,s they went for it which helped us have a couple of attacks on the counter. We then brought Alese on put Hume in CM. Another baffling decision
Click to expand...
But again - I’d imagine RLB’s thinking is we have a very solid defence. We can win the ball, play it quickly and we ‘should’ have them outnumbered instantly.

Not necessarily saying I agree just trying to understand his thinking.

It was a tight game and if we’d grabbed one then his tactics were genius and Wilder was far too aggressive and naive. It happens.
 
GipseT said:
1 in 5 is really bad... His lack of action during games is troublesome
Click to expand...
Does nobody fact check before posting? We have scored three in the past five. Our opponents have scored four. What happens at both ends of the pitch matters.

And we've kept ten clean sheets in 18 games. Play like that and you don't need to score many. The goals will come.
 
socrates said:
Agree with this. When we cameout for the second half I couldnt believe he hadnt changed things.

He should have had a back 4 of Hume, Ballard, O nein, Alese. Midfield of Roberts, Jobe, Rigg, Watson.

Isidor up front.

Neil was awful and should have been off. I couldnt fathom out what the second half format was.
Click to expand...
We've got to play our saleable assets it's speakmans orders . He tells the coaches who has to play that's why no one wanted the job .Neil walked mowbrsys said something down them lines . It's not rocket science
 
FifeMackem95 said:
But again - I’d imagine RLB’s thinking is we have a very solid defence. We can win the ball, play it quickly and we ‘should’ have them outnumbered instantly.

Not necessarily saying I agree just trying to understand his thinking.

It was a tight game and if we’d grabbed one then his tactics were genius and Wilder was far too aggressive and naive. It happens.
Click to expand...
I can only comment and have a opinion on what did happen though not what Might of been
 
T_Bone said:
I’m not reading all of this.
He was a strange appointment, given his past record of more failure than success.
I M O he is a yes man, a friendly front for Speakman, Procter and Dodds to pull the strings.
He is probs earning more money than he ever has and his remit is to go out and face the press, say what he is told to say .
Meet the New Boss, same as the old Boss.
Click to expand...
Spot on
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top