• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Regis le Bris - confirmed

I’ve no idea how good he is, how’s it going to turn out, but I’m gonna say if they are changing the back room staff it can’t be as bad as Dodds and Beale…

It has been a complete cluster f!ck of a process though. Write off half of the year to appoint someone with little experience and whose last season was a relegation. I mean it’s not great is it.
 

PitYacker said:
It has been a complete cluster f!ck of a process though. Write off half of the year to appoint someone with little experience and whose last season was a relegation. I mean it’s not great is it.
Click to expand...
I like the idea of KLD & Speakman identifying him in March & then watching him lose 7 on the bounce at the end of the season and thinking, “Yes, let’s hold out for this lad. It’s all worth it.”
 
Blyth said:
But you’re doing the same?
Click to expand...
In what way? What I'm trying to say is that some of these arguments are logical fallacies. They don't make any logical sense.

"I've never heard of Cifuentes or Rohl. I've never heard of le Bris. Therefore le Bris will be as good as Cifuentes/Rohl."

"Klopp and Wenger have been relegated. Le Bris has been relegated therefore he will be as good as Klopp/Wenger."

Might as well say elephants have ears, and I have ears, therefore I'm an elephant.
 
Blyth said:
Claiming to know the ins and out of this blokes career who he’d never heard of 48 hours ago :lol:

But you’re doing the same?
Click to expand...
I don’t know anything about him and it doesn’t seem like there’s a vast amount of information available explaining why after 4 months he’s emerged as the outstanding candidate. Apologies for being underwhelmed.
 
Black Cat Gypsy said:
Lorient is known to be a club that develops young players. Let's be honest, we don't know anything this guy. We are saying he's a bad appointment because Lorient got relegated. But Klopp got Mainz relegated and failed to get them promoted. He ended up getting the Dortmund job. Plenty of coaches have poor starts to their careers.
Click to expand...
Are they? Known where and who have they developed? I can’t find any evidence they have developed much.
Klopp also got Mainz promoted for the first time in the clubs history and then kept them up pretty comfortably for 2 seasons on the smallest budget by far. Pretty sure they also qualified for Europe. They were then relegated but Klopp had done way more than le Bris had. He was also way younger.
I don’t think most people are saying being relegated automatically crap managers but when it’s all you have on your cv it’s hard to ignore it!
 
genewolf said:
In what way? What I'm trying to say is that some of these arguments are logical fallacies. They don't make any logical sense.

"I've never heard of Cifuentes or Rohl. I've never heard of le Bris. Therefore le Bris will be as good as Cifuentes/Rohl."

"Klopp and Wenger have been relegated. Le Bris has been relegated therefore he will be as good as Klopp/Wenger."

Might as well say elephants have ears, and I have ears, therefore I'm an elephant.
Click to expand...

😄 Very Erasmus Montanus.
 
In his first season he won 15 games. 8 of those were in the first ten games. He's had a good few months there then been pretty poor after that.

You must be logged on to see external links
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top