• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Mates, now you know it all fake, ask yourself why woould they fake space. This is going to come as a bit of a shock to you, but here are no planets, none, no satellites, no space. We are in a locked pressurised environment, nothing comes in, nothing goes out. Its been designed and condstructed by something. Now why fake space??
 

What I don't get is why people don't question more. We've been repeatedly lied to and misled on just about everything. The horrors of the Epstein files a prime example.

It's OK to question things. Yes be open to counters but it's just one lie after another.

Lyme disease next.
 
The Blackcat Mackem said:
Reported in writing
You must be logged on to see media items

Mars is actually shot on Devon island. Planets dont exsit, they are lights under the firmament
Click to expand...
Do you have any proof of any of this? Given you are the ones making the wild claims that does not fit with basic observations, then I think you need a bit more to back it up. If you want some level of discussion.

Otherwise you can make these claims, others like me will say that is not true and it will end up like a pantomime.
monkeytassle said:
What I don't get is why people don't question more. We've been repeatedly lied to and misled on just about everything. The horrors of the Epstein files a prime example.

It's OK to question things. Yes be open to counters but it's just one lie after another.

Lyme disease next.
Click to expand...
It is absolutely ok to question things. What conspiracy theorists don't do is listen to the overwhelming evidence supporting the common view and instead come up with an alternate view with absolutely zero evidence behind it, except personal feeling.
 
Last edited:
niknak_123 said:
Which I’ve said I believe based on the evidence scientists have at this time. All I’m saying is scientific theories are allowed to evolve as more evidence is acquired
Click to expand...
I think you're mixing up what a scientific theory is, versus your theory on why there is no milk left in the fridge.

A scientific theory is a well-substantiated, comprehensive explanation of some aspect of the natural world that is based on a body of facts, laws, and tested hypotheses. It is not a guess, but a rigorously tested, reliable, and dynamic framework that explains why phenomena occur.
 
"Why don't people question more" is never followed by "...and that's why I subscribe to The New Scientist and read every latest development in where the current level of scientific knowledge and understanding is at, and where we are still a bit in the dark versus where experimental scientists have spent the last several hundred years testing, proving and refining Newtonian physics"
 
Cockney Mackem said:
"Why don't people question more" is never followed by "...and that's why I subscribe to The New Scientist and read every latest development in where the current level of scientific knowledge and understanding is at, and where we are still a bit in the dark versus where experimental scientists have spent the last several hundred years testing, proving and refining Newtonian physics"
Click to expand...
I've a degree in mechanical engineering
 
Stella Spark said:
You for real?
Be telling me moon landings are bollocks next

^^Someone send this nutter into space
Click to expand...
Stella post :cool:

Edit. Doesn't really make sense tbf Sparksy. I'm not doubting the official covid narrative, so seems odd to suggest I'd then doubt the landing.

I'd suggest those doubting the covid narrative are likely the same folk doubt the moon landing. And 9/11 etc.
DPTT said:
Are you nukey in disguise?
Click to expand...
He was on a wind up so could be.

Why would they fake space ffs :lol:
 
Last edited:
monkeytassle said:
What I don't get is why people don't question more. We've been repeatedly lied to and misled on just about everything. The horrors of the Epstein files a prime example.
Click to expand...

Surely people do question more. That's what academics, academic institutions and peer reviewed scientific journals do. The nature of the universe is constantly changing and being looked at in new ways, it's part of the scientific process. The question is not what could be true but what is reasonable.
monkeytassle said:
I've a degree in mechanical engineering
Click to expand...

Expertise in one field doesn’t override overwhelming evidence across many others. It's why we take advice from specialists in fields such as Areospace Engineering.

Missions such as Artemis are confirmed by many indeoendent international tracking, physical artifacts on the Moon, and decades of independent verification—not belief. Many of these have an active interest in discrediting or copying the U.S.

If you have an alternative viewpoint to anything that is substantiated by evidence, resoextes Peer reviewed scientific journals would welcome your perspective and we would be very interested in reading them.

On a personal I'd also like to hear about your views on Lyme Disease
 
Last edited:
The Blackcat Mackem said:
Mates, now you know it all fake, ask yourself why woould they fake space. This is going to come as a bit of a shock to you, but here are no planets, none, no satellites, no space. We are in a locked pressurised environment, nothing comes in, nothing goes out. Its been designed and condstructed by something. Now why fake space??
Click to expand...
quite the fishing trip you're on there mate, you'll get some bites with that bait.
 
Yankee Mackem said:
Surely people do question more. That's what academics, academic institutions and peer reviewed scientific journals do. The nature of the universe is constantly changing and being looked at in new ways, it's part of the scientific process. The question is not what could be true but what is reasonable.


Expertise in one field doesn’t override overwhelming evidence across many others. It's why we take advice from specialists in fields such as Areospace Engineering.

Missions such as Artemis are confirmed by many indeoendent international tracking, physical artifacts on the Moon, and decades of independent verification—not belief. Many of these have an active interest in discrediting or copying the U.S.

If you have an alternative viewpoint to anything that is substantiated by evidence, resoextes Peer reviewed scientific journals would welcome your perspective and we would be very interested in reading them.

On a personal I'd also like to hear about your views on Lyme Disease
Click to expand...
No but I do understand the basic principles of force, gravity and propulsion. I'm not really questioning artemis per se but I am very much doubting the original lunar landings. That's on me tho. I'm not ramming it down people's throats.

As for Lyme disease I read a transcript of an open forum discussion about inserting into vaccines the ability to make humans "allergic" to beef. The Asian guy speaking specifically referenced tolerance to milk amongst Asians. I initially thought about rushed vaccines and jumped to covid.

Then this week I read this:

You must be logged on to see external links

Getting fda approval despite missing threshold
 
monkeytassle said:
No but I do understand the basic principles of force, gravity and propulsion. I'm not really questioning artemis per se but I am very much doubting the original lunar landings. That's on me tho. I'm not ramming it down people's throats.

As for Lyme disease I read a transcript of an open forum discussion about inserting into vaccines the ability to make humans "allergic" to beef. The Asian guy speaking specifically referenced tolerance to milk amongst Asians. I initially thought about rushed vaccines and jumped to covid.

Then this week I read this:

You must be logged on to see external links

Getting fda approval despite missing threshold
Click to expand...

OK, so the Artemis mission is not the point of discussion here. Fair enough However, the claim to Lyme Disease is that Lyme Disease vaccines specifically make people have immune responses to vaccines - Or just that this specific vaccine has been rushed? Or is it a more general proposition that vaccines are genetally accepted blindly and rushed through?

From your earlier arguments its the latter?
 
Yankee Mackem said:
OK, so the Artemis mission is not the point of discussion here. Fair enough However, the claim to Lyme Disease is that Lyme Disease vaccines specifically make people have immune responses to vaccines - Or just that this specific vaccine has been rushed? Or is it a more general proposition that vaccines are genetally accepted blindly and rushed through?

From your earlier arguments its the latter?
Click to expand...
I think vaccines have been rushed yes. I think it's questionable that thresholds have been lowered. What brought it to my attention was the gates funded research into how vaccines could be used as an agent into lowering beef consumption.
 
dangermows said:
Stella post :cool:

Edit. Doesn't really make sense tbf Sparksy. I'm not doubting the official covid narrative, so seems odd to suggest I'd then doubt the landing.

I'd suggest those doubting the covid narrative are likely the same folk doubt the moon landing. And 9/11 etc.

He was on a wind up so could be.

Why would they fake space ffs :lol:
Click to expand...
The official narrative changed. The most likely cause is lab leak.

You're like a Japanese soldier emerging from the jungle still fighting the war, decked out in face mask and smeared with hand sanitiser ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top