• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
I tried doing that and it's there for anyone to look through regardless of whether you or others thi nk there's nothing.
That's not my issue.

So you keep telling me.
Click to expand...
You've explained how oceans lead you to believe there is a raised centre.
Can you point me towards this?
Can anyone else reading this remember this explanation?
 
So I take it the shallowest oceans and seas will all be around countries near to our so called North Pole.
And the deepest around the ones near the countries near the ice wall so called South Pole?
Nukehasslefan said:
There are a few on here who are really more interested than they care to admit, in my honest opinion.

And I'm more than happy for you to do that.

Yes.

Look it up.
Click to expand...
I've used the search function and can't find it?
Just briefly run over it again.
 
legend7 said:
So I take it the shallowest oceans and seas will all be around countries near to our so called North Pole.
And the deepest around the ones near the countries near the ice wall so called South Pole?

I've used the search function and can't find it?
Just briefly run over it again.
Click to expand...
I'll leave it to you to bring yourself back up to speed.
 
Kevj said:
My interest comes from a knowledge in science and the repeatable nature that demonstrates the world we live in. My interest also comes from the notion that I don’t suffer fools.
Click to expand...
Then that's absolutely fine by me. I certainly don't agree with your Earth stance but I respect your decision to keep to it. And as for suffering fools, I agree, why would you want to?
legend7 said:
I'm asking you a question.
So the deepest oceans will be around the countries closer to the ice wall "south pole" and vice versa?
Click to expand...
I'll let you do your own work because you've offered plenty and then decided you were offered nothing or cast it aside.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'll let you do your own work because you've offered plenty and then decided you were offered nothing or cast it aside.
Click to expand...
Well this is how you sort of said your world worked with oceans and landmasses.
So what about the oceans shows there is a raised centre.
What have you observed that proves it?


You must be logged on to see external links
 
legend7 said:
Well this is how you sort of said your world worked with oceans and landmasses.
So what about the oceans shows there is a raised centre.
What have you observed that proves it?


You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
without a raised centre the projector would get wet
DaveH said:
They don’t quite look the same. I remember being in Australia looking at the night sky and it was only after looking at one set of stars for a while, I realised it was Orion upside down to what we normally know it as. This works on a globe but not in a snow dome.

There is also parallax, which is difficult to detect with amateur equipment. The nearest stars appear to move slightly relative to the more distant stars as we go to the 6 month opposite of our orbit around the sun. That is also achievable with a projector, but it is a projector giving the exact appearance of a planet in orbit around the sun with stars at varying distances away. Like many many other effects.
Click to expand...
Aye, upside down, but in the same layout. We're not going to notice the parallax difference with these crappy eyes what with atmospheric demagnification of the magnification back to our eyes in terms of what's offered, and certainly not enough to suggest that we're beneath a dome.
 
Last edited:
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Aye, upside down, but in the same layout. We're not going to notice the parallax difference with these crappy eyes what with atmospheric demagnification of the magnification back to our eyes in terms of what's offered, and certainly not enough to suggest that we're beneath a dome.
Click to expand...
Aye we can't see objects a few miles out to sea because of dense atmospheric pressure but can magically see tiny reflections on the dome that is even further away, how does that work then?
 
legend7 said:
You've explained how oceans lead you to believe there is a raised centre.
Can you point me towards this?
Can anyone else reading this remember this explanation?
Click to expand...
Well water is level so it couldn't be that. I remember something about indentations but they aren't in steps like loch gates because it's the ocean
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top