• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

The Snockerty Friddle said:
You mean that 2d map illustrating a 3D reality?
Click to expand...
No.
SYB_DC said:
To answer your deliberate obtuseness, that flight doesn't operate anymore because SAA went bankrupt and is only now starting to pull out of it. They flew the route for years, though.
Click to expand...
I'm not picking any particular flight.
SYB_DC said:
As others said, your model should work for any other city as well. Let's pick one that has a massive airline hub with flights to all those places and isn't conveniently located near the center of your mp: Dubai.
Click to expand...
Or conveniently located in your fictional southern hemisphere.
 
Last edited:

Nukehasslefan said:
No.

I'm not picking any particular flight.

Or conveniently located in your fictional southern hemisphere.
Click to expand...
I think you'll need to show me a model of the world in which Dubai is in the Southern Hemisphere, my dude. Dubai is on approximately the same latitude as Miami.
Nukehasslefan said:
I'm not picking any particular flight.
Click to expand...
Yes, you are. Otherwise you would not have ignored the ones I pointed out that do fly several times a week over long open stretches of water.
 
Last edited:
SYB_DC said:
I think you'll need to show me a model of the world in which Dubai is in the Southern Hemisphere, my dude. Dubai is on approximately the same latitude as Miami.
Click to expand...
I think you need to read what I said.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
I'm not debating your stupidity. What would be the point? You've just spent about three weeks failing to understand the basics of measuring distances.

Then which map with curved red line?
Click to expand...
Why are you trying to debate with me?
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
I'm not. There isn't any debate about it. The Earth is a globe and a piece of string is the same length whether it's straight or rolled up in a ball.
Click to expand...
Of course but the distance to a destination will change by arc against level.
legend7 said:
It's the first one I found.
Feel free to look for more that go over seas
Flat seas as you say.
No curve reduction needed obviously 🙄🙄😂
Click to expand...
So when do I get to see this flight over the vast ocean?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Of course but the distance to a destination will change by arc against level.
Click to expand...
Twisty git. Shortest distance from one city to another will always include an arc because they're both on a globe. Yes you can make the distance greater by adding unnecessary curves but the distance remains the same. It's that simple. Yes you could tunnel, but that's only going to shorten the distance because it's a globe.
 
Pink Panther said:
Don't be distracted from this masterpiece.
The shortest route from South Africa to Japan or Australia is via Europe and the North Pole.
Click to expand...
That is the key bit being missed from all this deflection waffle. It was claimed that no conspiracy theorist has ever produced a map of a non-globe world where the distances match those measured and travelled regularly in reality.

He has failed to improve on this situation and that map is a complete and utter failed attempt. The distances do not match reality at all.

What is is good at though is turning things to put those asking the questions on the defence. Notice how he doesn't defend his crap map? Straight back to attacking the globe with waffle while putting nothing that actually works in it's place, then deflects with bits about spinning etc. All deflection but no substance.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Twisty git. Shortest distance from one city to another will always include an arc because they're both on a globe.
Click to expand...
The shortest distance to any point is a straight line. Your globe does not offer this.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
Yes you can make the distance greater by adding unnecessary curves but the distance remains the same.
Click to expand...
How can it remain the same from curve to straight and level?
The Snockerty Friddle said:
It's that simple. Yes you could tunnel, but that's only going to shorten the distance because it's a globe.
Click to expand...
And this is the issue. It's absolutely not a globe.
Kevj said:
Blissfully or wilfully arrogant once again.
Click to expand...
I won't hold it against you.
 
DaveH said:
That is the key bit being missed from all this deflection waffle. It was claimed that no conspiracy theorist has ever produced a map of a non-globe world where the distances match those measured and travelled regularly in reality.

He has failed to improve on this situation and that map is a complete and utter failed attempt. The distances do not match reality at all.

What is is good at though is turning things to put those asking the questions on the defence. Notice how he doesn't defend his crap map? Straight back to attacking the globe with waffle while putting nothing that actually works in it's place, then deflects with bits about spinning etc. All deflection but no substance.
Click to expand...
It's absolutely mental. It seems as though in flat earth word view that people can't know anything. No evidence is available, let alone valid.
DaveH said:
Why?
Click to expand...
fly off and smack into the dome, well at least come to a dead stop in the bit that's too cold for man or machine. I was going to say fly into space, but as we've learned, it doesn't exist outside the cell
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top