Put a flat earthier into space

[derum]

Going up in a rocket isn't going to prove anything. You'll only get so high before your fuel is spent and you come straight back down.

Flat Earth Society - We Have Members All Around the Globe

 

[legend7]

@Nukehasslefan any more thoughts as to how your map layout and distances work on my drawing

 

[Pancho]

Going up in a rocket isn't going to prove anything. You'll only get so high before your fuel is spent and you come straight back down.

You're not even trying now.

 

[payne]

Going up in a rocket isn't going to prove anything. You'll only get so high before your fuel is spent and you come straight back down.

How high must it be that a vehicle couldn't be fuelled sufficiently?

Again, putting a rule in place so the dome can't be known. Fantastic strategy by the way.

 

[DPTT]

Looking at the flat earth map (square and stationary earth by Orlando Ferguson, I think it’s very similar to the one @Nukehasslefan said is a fair representation of his “musing”

Why is New York to Sydney 9929 miles and Rio to Sydney only 8396 miles away but to get to Sydney from Rio you need to pass over New York

Any idea nukey?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Except that each and every scientific, cosmological, geological and meteorological phenomena can be reconciled with cast iron proof, with one model - the heliocentric model.

It's very easy for you to say because you have everything at your fingertips.
The reality is you do not know this to be true, you simply argue for it.

You can't even offer one rational explanation for a single phenomena, never mind a working model.

I've offered plenty but it's denied and I expect it to be denied when considering the global model is the majority mindset.
I offer the same back to you. You've offered nothing at all for a working globe except to follow schooled mass opinion.

Personal incredulity is not scientific argument.

I agree but neither is personal acceptance/belief of something you have no proof of.

You're a member of a spectacularly dumb cult.

You feel free to lump me into anything you wish and I'm fine with it.

So all of this is because you never got over finding out Santa isn't real?

Is Santa real and if not when did you find out?

@Nukehasslefan any more thoughts as to how your map layout and distances work on my drawing

No. I haven't paid any attention to it to work out distances. I don't see the need to do so. It'll go nowhere.

You're not even trying now.

You get what you get and you are free to deal with it in any way you see fit.

 

[payne]

It's very easy for you to say because you have everything at your fingertips.
The reality is you do not know this to be true, you simply argue for it.

There we have it again; all known knowledge is faked. He knows better than everyone else. He really does think he's smarter than all who have ever lived. It's incredible.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

How high must it be that a vehicle couldn't be fuelled sufficiently?

It would depend on the vehicle. Basically, fuel to mass ratio.

 

[legend7]

No. I haven't paid any attention to it to work out distances. I don't see the need to do so. It'll go nowhere.

Surely distances are part of the fundamental argument?
Basically yours doesn't work, I've shown how it doesn't work, so you're basically admitting you don't have an answer to it.
So we are right.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

There we have it again; all known knowledge is faked. He knows better than everyone else. He really does think he's smarter than all who have ever lived. It's incredible.

You can think whatever you wish. If this is your thinking then I have n control over it so I say, you go with whatever suits you.

Surely distances are part of the fundamental argument?

They can be if they're physically married up to a legitimate map.

Basically yours doesn't work, I've shown how it doesn't work, so you're basically admitting you don't have an answer to it.
So we are right.

You've shown nothing of the sort. You tell me it doesn't and that's fine.
What are you basing it on?

 

[payne]

It would depend on the vehicle. Basically, fuel to mass ratio.

So, the dome changes height depending on what vehicle approaches it? Interesting. Did it react in such a way before humans invented vehicles that could leave the ground?

 

[fyl2u]

Is Santa real and if not when did you find out?

Whether or not Santa is real is not a science question. You don't have NDT or Bill Nye interviewing Brian Greene about his latest theory of where Santa lives, what enables his sleigh and reindeer to defy gravity, or how he comes down your chimney when you live in a house that doesn't have a chimney.

Just because your parents lied about this doesn't mean that literally everything that anyone has ever told you is therefore a lie (except those Flat Earth Youtubers who apparently always tell the truth).

 

[Nukehasslefan]

So, the dome changes height depending on what vehicle approaches it?

Interesting. Did it react in such a way before humans invented vehicles that could leave the ground?

Not at all.
The dome will change height but has nothing to do with what vehicles are launched towards it.

 

[payne]

You can think whatever you wish. If this is your thinking then I have n control over it so I say, you go with whatever suits you.

They can be if they're physically married up to a legitimate map.

You've shown nothing of the sort. You tell me it doesn't and that's fine.
What are you basing it on?

It's what you think and what you express when you redefine every subject known to man with your own invention. Be honest for once. You think you know better about the reality of the world and all known science better than anyone else, thus making you believe all known knowledge is wrong and faked.

We're all honest when we think and say you're a fool. Why not just say we're stupid morons who can't critically think. We'd appreciate the honesty for the first time.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

It's very easy for you to say because you have everything at your fingertips.
The reality is you do not know this to be true, you simply argue for it.

Just keep on parroting that line if it's all you've got.

I've offered plenty but it's denied and I expect it to be denied when considering the global model is the majority mindset.
I offer the same back to you. You've offered nothing at all for a working globe except to follow schooled mass opinion.

Yeah it really is all you've got isn't it

I agree but neither is personal acceptance/belief of something you have no proof of.

Same shit

Is Santa real and if not when did you find out?

No and I was about 5 or 6. I quickly got over it though.

 

[payne]

Not at all.
The dome will change height but has nothing to do with what vehicles are launched towards it.

How high must it be that a vehicle couldn't be fuelled sufficiently?

It would depend on the vehicle. Basically, fuel to mass ratio.



You state that the height depends on the vehicle.

Which vehicle changes the height?

Just keep on parroting that line if it's all you've got.

Yeah it really is all you've got isn't it

Same shit

No and I was about 5 or 6. I quickly got over it though.

I reckon he believed in Santa until the invention of youtube like how his flat earth brainwashing began

 

[legend7]

They can be if they're physically married up to a legitimate map.

You've shown nothing of the sort. You tell me it doesn't and that's fine.
What are you basing it on?

You said our flat maps and your lemon squeezer maps were fairly representative of where the land masses are in your world.
I have shown that on your 50000 mile wide world they can't be.
Feel free to scribble some more countries onto that 50k wide circle I posted (to scale)

 

[DPTT]

Looking at the flat earth map (square and stationary earth by Orlando Ferguson, I think it’s very similar to the one @Nukehasslefan said is a fair representation of his “musing”

Why is New York to Sydney 9929 miles and Rio to Sydney only 8396 miles away but to get to Sydney from Rio you need to pass over New York

Any idea nukey?

@Nukehasslefan any ideas

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Whether or not Santa is real is not a science question.

Correct, it's a lie but a truth to a person who accepts it as a truth/belief, and also a lie told as truth only when it suits.

You don't have NDT or Bill Nye interviewing Brian Greene about his latest theory of where Santa lives, what enables his sleigh and reindeer to defy gravity, or how he comes down your chimney when you live in a house that doesn't have a chimney.

But then again empty space offers a path for rocks and man-made vehicles and we can argue similarly. Is that really science?
You say yes, I say not at all.
It comes right back to Santa and so on but for kids and many many adults this time.

Just because your parents lied about this doesn't mean that literally everything that anyone has ever told you is therefore a lie (except those Flat Earth Youtubers who apparently always tell the truth).

Correct it doesn't mean everything is a lie but it also doesn't mean everything is the truth either.

It's what you think and what you express when you redefine every subject known to man with your own invention. Be honest for once. You think you know better about the reality of the world and all known science better than anyone else, thus making you believe all known knowledge is wrong and faked.

I don't think I9 know better. I believe I know what Earth is not and I try to find the best solution to what Earth may well be.
I may never find it out so all I can offer is my thoughts.
What you or others take from them is down to you and how you take them in terms of feeling that you think I think I'm better is your own issue, not mine.

We're all honest when we think and say you're a fool.

And I accept it and have no issue with it but equally, people should not then start crying when they feel their own ego has been hurt or they think I'm being mean to them when I'm simply being me and not backing down which frustrates some people...some worse than others.

Why not just say we're stupid morons who can't critically think.

Because I don't think that. I actually think many of you on here are smart, intelligent, and pretty decent, amid the digs and such.
If some take that as me thinking they're whatever you say then that's their issue, not mine, as I keep mentioning.

We'd appreciate the honesty for the first time.

That's what you're getting and you'll have to take it for what you see it as, whatever that is. I'm not in charge of that.

It would depend on the vehicle. Basically, fuel to mass ratio.



You state that the height depends on the vehicle.

Which vehicle changes the height?

It depends on the vehicle and the fuel used to elevate it.

You said our flat maps and your lemon squeezer maps were fairly representative of where the land masses are in your world.
I have shown that on your 50000 mile wide world they can't be.
Feel free to scribble some more countries onto that 50k wide circle I posted (to scale)

And I told you that a lot of it is uninhabitable.

@Nukehasslefan any ideas

I don't know, show me.

 

[legend7]

And I told you that a lot of it is uninhabitable.

So mark on it roughly the uninhabited zone and how you know its appx width if nobody has ever been?
What brought you to the conclusion about how far it encroaches into the 50k wide world?