• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

payne said:
it's nuts how he believes nobody knows out and how all known knowledge is wrong at every level, although it all is applied in all aspects of life
Click to expand...
I don't say all knowledge is wrong at every level and nor do I think nobody knows anything. That's down to you, not me.
DPTT said:
@Nukehasslefan agree or not🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
Disagree, they are not based on a globe. If I thought they were then I wouldn't be arguing against a globe.
Pancho said:
Your first paragraph is just word salad with appalling syntax.
Click to expand...
No need to worry about it.
Pancho said:
The source is an experienced pilot who has in the past calculated and produced his own flight plans.
Click to expand...
Flight plans for where and using what to offer up a globe to him or her?
Pancho said:
The fundamental mathematical formula to those calculations is based upon the radius of the globe.
Click to expand...
How?
Pancho said:
That is an unassailable fact and one that is proven literally thousands of times every day when the flight times of all international flights are entirely consistent with a core radius of 3,950 miles.
Click to expand...
How do you know this?
Pancho said:
It's mathematically indisputable.
Click to expand...
In your opinion.
DaveH said:
I'll give you a clue. It is quite far, but not anywhere near as far as it would be on a disc. The distances don't work on a disc, they do on a globe. This is just a fact. You need to accept it or forever live in paranoid ignorance.
Click to expand...
How would you know?
Your world is based on supposed global calculations which may well not be that and for me is absolutely not that.
 
Last edited:

@Nukehasslefan so you’ve accepted distances are correct but we aren’t on a globe?
Can you provide any workings from your side on how you get the same results and maybe show this map which will verify that the distances are the same on both a globe and your world 🤷‍♂️👌
 
DPTT said:
@Nukehasslefan so you’ve accepted distances are correct but we aren’t on a globe?
Can you provide any workings from your side on how you get the same results and maybe show this map which will verify that the distances are the same on both a globe and your world 🤷‍♂️👌
Click to expand...
No, I can't. I have no access to anything to achieve that just like you have none to back up anything you say.

Can you explain how you know you're on a spinning globe?

Let's make this simple and logical.
You think you're on a spinning globe.
You take off in a plane going against the spin so you're now independent of that spin. You're at the equator and are flying at 1038 mph, give or take.

How long will it take you to get to a destination 1038 miles away from your take-off point and can you explain why?

And also you hover in a helicopter for one hour, where is your start point and where is your finish point. And can you explain why?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No, I can't. I have no access to anything to achieve that just like you have none to back up anything you say.

Can you explain how you know you're on a spinning globe?

Let's make this simple and logical.
You think you're on a spinning globe.
You take off in a plane going against the spin so you're now independent of that spin. You're at the equator and are flying at 1038 mph, give or take.

How long will it take you to get to a destination 1038 miles away from your take-off point and can you explain why?

And also you hover in a helicopter for one hour, where is your start point and where is your finish point. And can you explain why?
Click to expand...
So the conclusion is you have nothing to say apart from “Earth is not a globe” without any evidence stating how it’s not a globe👌

At least you’ve admitted again that you have no data or evidence for anything you have said

Am sure someone who is very knowledgeable in this area will answer that, I would have to appeal
To authority to give an answer and we all know that’s frowned upon by you
 
DPTT said:
So the conclusion is you have nothing to say apart from “Earth is not a globe” without any evidence stating how it’s not a globe👌

At least you’ve admitted again that you have no data or evidence for anything you have said

Am sure someone who is very knowledgeable in this area will answer that, I would have to appeal
To authority to give an answer and we all know that’s frowned upon by you
Click to expand...
It's not frowned upon and you're more than welcome to appeal to whatever.
All I want is your logic on it while you explain it.

You see this stuff is where the global nonsense rears its head but many people tend to shy away from answering it because they know it makes no sense but official lines of authority offer it so forget how silly it all is, it must be it..
 
Nukehasslefan said:
The great circle is simply supposedly following a globe instead of a straight and level path.
It's a good story from the globalists but only that as far as I'm concerned.
It's all about what each person wants to look at.
A level flight with simple knowledge of it being that or following a curvature with no knowledge of it by sense.
Basically, we're told a plane just automatically follows a curve at a specific height for whatever reasons.
Click to expand...

Whatever reasons: tangents, normals, gravity. Down is always downwards toward the planet's centre of gravity regardless of how far an aeroplane has travelled. It's not rocket science, it's first year geometry and physics lessons at school.

Nukehasslefan said:
Then you keep to that. I have no issue with you claiming I'm wrong. I just disagree with you.
Click to expand...

You can disagree all you like, you still get an F.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No, I can't. I have no access to anything to achieve that just like you have none to back up anything you say.

Can you explain how you know you're on a spinning globe?

Let's make this simple and logical.
You think you're on a spinning globe.
You take off in a plane going against the spin so you're now independent of that spin. You're at the equator and are flying at 1038 mph, give or take.

How long will it take you to get to a destination 1038 miles away from your take-off point and can you explain why?

And also you hover in a helicopter for one hour, where is your start point and where is your finish point. And can you explain why?
Click to expand...
Research conservation of momentum and when you realise you're too dumb to understand the concept, pop back on here and one of the bright lads will explain it in very simple terms.
 
Pancho said:
Research conservation of momentum and when you realise you're too dumb to understand the concept, pop back on here and one of the bright lads will explain it in very simple terms.
Click to expand...
There's no such thing as conservation of momentum. It cannot ever be a thing unless a magic supposed vacuum is used.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
And also you hover in a helicopter for one hour, where is your start point and where is your finish point. And can you explain why?
Click to expand...

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Here he goes with his "Why doesn't a helicopter land somewhere miles away after hovering for an hour" bollocks again.

It's this kind of comment that really shows the level of ignorance and lack of intelligence he has.

We're dealing with someone with the mind of a five-year-old.
Nukehasslefan said:
There's no such thing as conservation of momentum. It cannot ever be a thing unless a magic supposed vacuum is used.
Click to expand...

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top