• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
The dome is ice. Clear ice. It's the perfect mirror. It's not hanging, it's natural as I explained a good while back.
Maybe someone will help you out with that.
Click to expand...
So can you project stars on a dome, rotating in one direction and then half way along this dome it reflects on itself and the stars appear to rotate the opposite way around another rotational axis, while changing their positions etc? If you can knock up a quick video demonstrating this, I'd love to see it, because I don't think anyone has ever managed to do that. It is not how conventional domes or reflections work.
 
On the left - a reflection in a dome-shape.

If that was above our heads, we'd be able to see ourselves, the projector, and the landmass on the other side of the projector, all reflected upside down in this "perfect mirror". You'll notice that it's just one single distorted upside-down image, and not half an image rightway-up and a mirror image of that upside-down from halfway across the dome as would be necessary to produce "mirrored stars" on the equator like Nukey just stated.

Literally the only piece of equipment you need to show that Nukey's talking bollocks again is a spoon.

Logon or register to see this image
 
fyl2u said:
On the left - a reflection in a dome-shape.

If that was above our heads, we'd be able to see ourselves, the projector, and the landmass on the other side of the projector, all reflected upside down in this "perfect mirror". You'll notice that it's just one single distorted upside-down image, and not half an image rightway-up and a mirror image of that upside-down from halfway across the dome as would be necessary to produce "mirrored stars" on the equator like Nukey just stated.

Literally the only piece of equipment you need to show that Nukey's talking bollocks again is a spoon.

Logon or register to see this image
Click to expand...
Wrong side of the spoon.And where's the banana?
 
DaveH said:
You claim that the air is more dense at sea levels than on a mountain top and that causes objects to fall. Low pressure high up, high pressure further down squeezes objects down from low pressure into higher pressure. And this is caused by layers of atmospheric density.
Click to expand...
For anything to fall, its dense mass must be placed into a higher atmosphere and can be squeezed/pushed against more than the resistance below can stop it.
This is why objects fall faster or slower or float depending on their dense mass against the push back against that dense mass.
DaveH said:
I can see a few things wrong with that, but you were asking about scientific method and you always say dig deeper. So we must ask why these layers are stacked, what is in each layer, what causes it to be in that layer and then we can look again to see if that is the case, does that explain an object falling. For now, rather than dismiss out of hand, we go with the assumption of what you said is true. Test the theory.
Click to expand...
Think of each molecule as layers within layers. The more layers the more dense the molecule is.
Let's assume gold. The make-up of gold would be very dense molecular layers making up the nugget or bar or whatever. It is very dense because of this.
It's not very porous and can also displace a lot of atmospheres, allowing little to be part of it.

Then you have water at the other end of the scale. It is made up of varying molecules and minerals but not layered anywhere near the dense mass of gold.
Then you have an atmosphere that can hold even fewer layers at sea level and even less as the stack is built up and all of the differing densities due to the layers inside the molecules which are themselves layers and stacked as a mass all the way to the top.

DaveH said:
So why is the air more dense at sea level than on a mountain top?
Click to expand...
What it holds and the amount within the stacking system.
Think of this below as a highly dense molecule.
No, imagine one with less layering and so on and so on.
You must be logged on to see external links

Now imagine them in a stack with different layers and interlinked as those layers are broken down due to expansion and being crushed up by denser molecules below and around.
You must be logged on to see external links

And yes this is a pyramid shape but I could make it much wider and offer the top as layers along the stack instead of the one at the top. This is to offer you the idea and reasoning behind it.
Take from it what you will.

DaveH said:
I don't want to be too nit picking on this, and I might be incorrect. But, traditionally a mirror has an identical but reversed image of what it is reflecting. The southern sky (or the bit that appears to rotate the other way for those who don't believe in South) looks completely different to the northern sky. Where is the mirror? Why is the mirror there and how does that mirror give a reflection of something different? Can this effect be repeated in a lab?
Click to expand...
You're looking up at a dome and from an area. You will see many images and not see the reflection because your eyesight just isn't good enough to see that distance.
Nobby said:
Fine how about the evidence for the earth not being a globe?
Click to expand...
I've more than given it. What you do with it or take from it is not my cocnern.
Roman maroni said:
Well, how the hell is it a mirror, if it's clear ice? You'd see through it surely.
Click to expand...
Have you ever looked through a window at night with nothing in the background outside of that window? I'm guessing you have.
What do you see?
Do you see what's actually inside of the window, meaning inside of the place you're standing in? It's clear glass, right?
Set against what?
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
For anything to fall, its dense mass must be placed into a higher atmosphere and can be squeezed/pushed against more than the resistance below can stop it.
This is why objects fall faster or slower or float depending on their dense mass against the push back against that dense mass.

Think of each molecule as layers within layers. The more layers the more dense the molecule is.
Let's assume gold. The make-up of gold would be very dense molecular layers making up the nugget or bar or whatever. It is very dense because of this.
It's not very porous and can also displace a lot of atmospheres, allowing little to be part of it.

Then you have water at the other end of the scale. It is made up of varying molecules and minerals but not layered anywhere near the dense mass of gold.
Then you have an atmosphere that can hold even fewer layers at sea level and even less as the stack is built up and all of the differing densities due to the layers inside the molecules which are themselves layers and stacked as a mass all the way to the top.


What it holds and the amount within the stacking system.
Think of this below as a highly dense molecule.
No, imagine one with less layering and so on and so on.
You must be logged on to see external links

Now imagine them in a stack with different layers and interlinked as those layers are broken down due to expansion and being crushed up by denser molecules below and around.
You must be logged on to see external links

And yes this is a pyramid shape but I could make it much wider and offer the top as layers along the stack instead of the one at the top. This is to offer you the idea and reasoning behind it.
Take from it what you will.


You're looking up at a dome and from an area. You will see many images and not see the reflection because your eyesight just isn't good enough to see that distance.

I've more than given it. What you do with it or take from it is not my cocnern.

Have you ever looked through a window at night with nothing in the background outside of that window? I'm guessing you have.
What do you see?
Do you see what's actually inside of the window, meaning inside of the place you're standing in? It's clear glass, right?
Set against what?
Click to expand...

What is causing them to stack that way up and not the other way around or even just chaotically? Are you suggesting there's some magical force that determines which way is up and which way is down?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I've more than given it. What you do with it or take from it is not my cocnern.
Click to expand...
You've said water level that's a statement not a proof.

What evidence di you have to show water is level across the world, how did you do it, so that others can repeat and confirm your findings?
 
Nobby said:
So after over 13700 comments your proof of a non global earth is you accept what you have been told about water being flat.

Your whole belief is based on an appeal to authority
Click to expand...
Nope. That's undeniable for anyone.
Water finds its own level. The key is level.
The globe offers nothing for that.
This alone wipes the globe out and it's the simplest one.
The Snockerty Friddle said:
And yet a few post back you used "mirror image" to explain what can be seen. There's some very selective reflections going on in your world.

See above.
Click to expand...
Eyesight. Do not overestimate it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top