• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

The evidence that's so simple yet conclusive you won't share it!!!!!

The police caution springs to mind as being a good view the inference of Mon disclosure. You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.
He bangs on about simple experiments that he's seen/viewed/done. As we all know witness testimony is not regarded as the greatest of evidence as we make up our own view of events. Scientists know this so have the control group of experiments to take away the human error and bias factor.

Flat earth guy will not perform any actual experiments or divulge because he believes his world view like a fundamentalist and believes he's infallible.
 

The earth is round.
Nailed it
I believe you're wrong.

You're not presenting anything against what I said. You used a room that locked in the air one minute and then a grate throwing air in the next and said you had sensors all over the room detecting pressure.
I explained what I did to you so it's not like I didn't answer it.

I'll make this a bit easier.
If you offer a ball to the ground that ball sits in many many layers of atmosphere and it also displaces that many layers by its own dense mass.
Those layers are pushed up into other layers and add pressure to those layers by the amount of dense mass the ball has displaced.
That pressure has to go somewhere and it does. It comes right back onto the ball and is crushing back on that ball to equalize.
The ball would be pushed down if it wasn't for the ground being much more resistant to the push from above and the squeeze from all around.

There are stacked layers and it's the very reason why there is little air for us at height and plenty at sea level.
It's simply denser at sea level and less dense as the stacked layers go up.

It's all about thinking a bit deeper about it.
So what causes these layers to form?
 
Last edited:
Hold on..

I thought this was a perfectly sealed dome? Hence you refusing to acknowledge pulling and sucking.

Now we have multiple domes and people tunnelling into them?

But the globe theory is nonsense? :lol:
You need to think deep and freely. Paint thinners helps.

Picture the universe like an aero, all domed bubbles on the inside but joined by orange and mint on the outside. Can someone living in one of those bubbles really know there are other bubbles or the flavour joining them together?

Just think on it.
 
It’s round mate and everything else is just pseudo intellectual clap trap

The time has come to lock this thread.
It is a fact that we have a ‘pudgy’ planet. The earth is fatter in the middle than at both of the polar ends. The center or ‘equator’ is the fattest part of all. You might not be able to tell that in any of the pictures, but it’s true. The reason for the chunkier look to the planet is because earth is constantly turning and something called ‘centrifugal force’ pushes everything to the center of the planet and out.

source
 
It is a fact that we have a ‘pudgy’ planet. The earth is fatter in the middle than at both of the polar ends. The center or ‘equator’ is the fattest part of all. You might not be able to tell that in any of the pictures, but it’s true. The reason for the chunkier look to the planet is because earth is constantly turning and something called ‘centrifugal force’ pushes everything to the center of the planet and out.

source
Ok I will join in.

There is no such thing as centrifugal force.

Its centripetal force.
 
again, its an interesting train of thought, how much myth is based on some kind of real life, its also interesting how some stories seem to reappear over time, the great floods and the ark for example, the 40 days and 40 nights has appeared in many cultures in different forms, but does that prove it really happened or is it that the story was passed along trade routes and reused by different cultures?
With regards different creatures from myth and legend where do we draw the line, do orcs and fairies have a base in real life, vampires or any of the other amounts of creates that have appeared over the years in texts and books, as you say history is HIS-STORY.
I suppose it all comes down to the persons upbringing and beliefs.
A complete side track from the thread here. The first civilisations appeared in the area around modern day Iraq, mostly in the flat lands between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. Similar to the Nile, it was the regular flooding of these rivers that kept the land fertile and suitable for farming. However some years the floods were large, would sweep across the land and so the people would live in fear of a great flood. The oldest known recorded story is the , a story which contains a flood story remarkably similar to Noah's ark. It had the key components, a fear they could all relate to and a hero they could all want to be or be protected by.

Human civilisation fanned out from there and with it, it's stories. Many were changed but the basics remained and were adopted into new folk law or religion and so the stories carried. However native Americans and Australian Aboriginals were thought to have come from an earlier human migration when we were largely hunter gatherer societies and they don't have a flood story in their culture.

There is also evidence of a large asteroid strike leaving a crater in the Indian Ocean. Estimates say it was formed around 3000 BC and this would have led to tsunamis and flooding in India, the Persian Gulf and Eastern Africa, again putting flooding as a real danger into the cradle of human civilisation but leaving other far remote groups untouched.
And no one has ever been to the moon
You can use the same arguments used here to completely deny the existence of marshmallow. Nobody can actually prove it exists.
 
Last edited:
A complete side track from the thread here. The first civilisations appeared in the area around modern day Iraq, mostly in the flat lands between the rivers Tigris and Euphrates. Similar to the Nile, it was the regular flooding of these rivers that kept the land fertile and suitable for farming. However some years the floods were large, would sweep across the land and so the people would live in fear of a great flood. The oldest known recorded story is the , a story which contains a flood story remarkably similar to Noah's ark. It had the key components, a fear they could all relate to and a hero they could all want to be or be protected by.

Human civilisation fanned out from there and with it, it's stories. Many were changed but the basics remained and were adopted into new folk law or religion and so the stories carried. However native Americans and Australian Aboriginals were thought to have come from an earlier human migration when we were largely hunter gatherer societies and they don't have a flood story in their culture.

There is also evidence of a large asteroid strike leaving a crater in the Indian Ocean. Estimates say it was formed around 3000 BC and this would have led to tsunamis and flooding in India, the Persian Gulf and Eastern Africa, again putting flooding as a real danger into the cradle of human civilisation but leaving other far remote groups untouched.

You can use the same arguments used here to completely deny the existence of marshmallow. Nobody can actually prove it exists.
I have marshmallows in the cupboard and confirm they do exist
 
Back
Top