Put a flat earthier into space

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Prepared to look where?

#13,230

Give me one simple example without appealing to authority.

Several listed in #13,230 I even said none of these need any appeal to authority in the post

I try to understand lots of things. That they do not suit you is not my problem.

The point being, you clearly do not understand the things which as has been said, will show you all the proof you need and have no intention of trying to do so.

If I knew it to be proof I certainly would not reject it. Until I know it's proof I'm well within my rights to question it and/or reject it based on what's on offer at that specific time, until something resembling proof is deemed closer to acceptance from me.

Well you'll just never know until you look. Do the shadow experiment before, during and after the equinox and once you can explain the results you will have all the proof you need.

What proof can you offer from yourself, without actually appealing to authority, in terms of what we're debating or arguing or whatever it is you think is happening?

As listed in #13,230

I can offer that to you. Unless you can explain why they do it without appealing to authority.

You cant, because all you have offered is an obviously flawed dome model with no supporting evidence and a lot of your own "appeals to authority"

 

[Nukehasslefan]

A compass works by other means?

In my opinion, yes.

You do know you can use a magnet on a pin to magnetise it, stick it in a floating Cork and make your own, one of the simplest physics experiment in the world

A compass is exactly that. It will follow the push of the central vortex.

How do yours work? Magic?

It can appear magical but it works from atmospheric vortex changes.

Still waiting for anything you have done to prove the earth is not a globe

There's been plenty on offer so take from any of it whatever you wish, whether you think there's nothing to take or whatever, is up to you.
I'm still waiting for proof of a globe.

The point being, you clearly do not understand the things which as has been said, will show you all the proof you need and have no intention of trying to do so.

In your opinion which you're obviously entitled to. I just do not share it.

Well you'll just never know until you look. Do the shadow experiment before, during and after the equinox and once you can explain the results you will have all the proof you need.

Explain how it works from your spinning globe.

You cant, because all you have offered is an obviously flawed dome model with no supporting evidence and a lot of your own "appeals to authority"

What I offer does not have to be considered by anyone. It's down to each individual what they want to take from whatever I say, whether it's zero or a tiny snippet or whether they sit back and ponder it without actually letting on to the majority against it.
I believe many have been given food for thought.

 

[GingerNick]

An atmospheric vortex... How does this work?

A compass works in a vacuum chamber, its not affected by any atmospheric factors

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Explain how it works from your spinning globe.

Do the experiment yourself and you'll see. You wouldn't want to appeal to authority now would you?

What I offer does not have to be considered by anyone.

You have offered nothing

I believe many have been given food for thought.

 

[legend7]

It's very clear to me that I didn't say I'd done them. I said I'd done experiments, but I didn't specify all of those experiments. I hope this clears everything up for you. If not then feel free to start again.

Absolute horseshit, your reply was directly about superfluids and in fact it was to rebuff someone who suggested your superfluid idea was just made up in your head.
Go back and read it again plus some of your replies just after that.
Complete fabrication once again by someone who has no idea what he is talking about.

 

[nahwee]

An atmospheric vortex... How does this work?

A compass works in a vacuum chamber, its not affected by any atmospheric factors

No such thing as a vacuum, keep up!

 

[taipeisafc]

An atmospheric vortex... How does this work?

A compass works in a vacuum chamber, its not affected by any atmospheric factors

Also works underwater

 

[legend7]

Also works underwater

Some vortex that isn't it, it's atmospheric changes make a compass move yet it follows the atmospheric vortex even when surrounded by water currents.
@Nukehasslefan can you explain this?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

An atmospheric vortex... How does this work?

Just think of it like an atmospheric whirlpool or if you prefer think of a sink and plug hole with everything moving around it toward the centre or fighting against it.

A compass works in a vacuum chamber, its not affected by any atmospheric factors

An evacuation chamber does not allow all atmosphere to leave it. It never can. Pressure always exists all of the time, anywhere.

Also works underwater

Yep.

Some vortex that isn't it, it's atmospheric changes make a compass move yet it follows the atmospheric vortex even when surrounded by water currents.

Of course. The push is always to the centre whether atmospheric or water and atmosphere combined...and whatnot.

@Nukehasslefan can you explain this?

I think it's self-explanatory.

 

[legend7]

Just think of it like an atmospheric whirlpool or if you prefer think of a sink and plug hole with everything moving around it toward the centre or fighting against it.

An evacuation chamber does not allow all atmosphere to leave it. It never can. Pressure always exists all of the time, anywhere.

Yep.

Of course. The push is always to the centre whether atmospheric or water and atmosphere combined...and whatnot.

I think it's self-explanatory.

 

[DPTT]

Just think of it like an atmospheric whirlpool or if you prefer think of a sink and plug hole with everything moving around it toward the centre or fighting against it.

An evacuation chamber does not allow all atmosphere to leave it. It never can. Pressure always exists all of the time, anywhere.

Yep.

Of course. The push is always to the centre whether atmospheric or water and atmosphere combined...and whatnot.

I think it's self-explanatory.

Is this vortex in the same place as your crystal projectors as well

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Is this vortex in the same place as your crystal projectors as well

The strongest part of it is, yes.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

I think it's self-explanatory.

Or in other words... no

 

[DPTT]

The strongest part of it is, yes.

Amazing how this atmospheric whirlpool doesn’t affect the image of the sun mind, some clever shit going on

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Amazing how this atmospheric whirlpool doesn’t affect the image of the sun mind, some clever shit going on

Why would it?

 

[nahwee]

Why would it?

Why would it not?

 

[taipeisafc]

An evacuation chamber does not allow all atmosphere to leave it. It never can. Pressure always exists all of the time, anywhere.

You've changed your tune. Hundreds of posts ago you stated that vacuum was not caused by flow in or out of gases merely crushing. Even when I put up graphs from our control system showing flow and pressure for evacuating a vessel you wouldn't have it. You need a good memory to be a good liar.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Why would it not?

You tell me.

You've changed your tune. Hundreds of posts ago you stated that vacuum was not caused by flow in or out of gases merely crushing. Even when I put up graphs from our control system showing flow and pressure for evacuating a vessel you wouldn't have it. You need a good memory to be a good liar.

There's no such thing as a vacuum. Low pressure.

 

[taipeisafc]

You tell me.

There's no such thing as a vacuum. Low pressure.

Answer the question - don't deflect with definitions (even though you are wrong a vacuum is any pressure below a recognised datum - typically atmospheric pressure)

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Answer the question - don't deflect with definitions (even though you are wrong a vacuum is any pressure below a recognised datum - typically atmospheric pressure)

I have answered it.
I don't even know what you're offering as to what you think I have said that is a contradiction.

I'll jog your memory.

An evacuation chamber requires a pump to push the external atmosphere away from the chamber in order to allow expansion of the atmosphere already inside that container and thus allow the release of some pressure from that chamber.
Nothing is sucked out because suction does not exist, nor pull. Just push.

So tell me what I've said that contradicts?