Did he though, religion is identical to science and space according to numbnuts.Jesus wept.
All just stories
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did he though, religion is identical to science and space according to numbnuts.Jesus wept.
Did he though, religion is identical to science and space according to numbnuts.
All just stories
I can’t find anything describing light reflecting off a dome, making a secondary reflection in a way that light doesn’t normally reflect off a dome and then hitting itself and cancelling itself out to create nothing. You get the dark spotted pattern by shining light through a defraction grating but I can’t find any instance of light reflecting back on itself to create complete darkness.So...if the moon orbits the Earth then how do we only see only one face of it?
Because the sun moves over and around the Earth circle and illuminates those areas but we can still see the distance of it more angled in terms of winter to us and summer to other parts.
This is why when you see the sun supposedly rising or setting, it's simple moving towards or away from us over that dome and the light and heat from it gets stronger or weaker, respectively.
A clydesdale.
Wavelength is just a word.
Then you can throw it out. I'll keep it.
To understand this is to understand how colours blend or are reflected or absorbed.
It can. Look it up. I'm sure there'll be stuff on it.
You're not compelled to believe it but take a look anyway.
Dense air pressure would stop you seeing the light if it was at the bottom.Also why do we build lighthouses so tall or/ and on a high area and with the light on the very top, if the sea is totally flat then ships would still see them if they were just head height surely
And also much louder for the ships as light is the same as sound, I'm surprised those lighthouses don't sound like sirens as they spin around actually.Dense air pressure would stop you seeing the light if it was at the bottom.
Although the denser air pressure has more molecular density so it should have more friction of pressure so the light should get brighter.
Therefore instead of disappearing "over the horizon" things should be brighter and easier to see
Transit of the moon
Transit of the sun
Transit of the stars
The tides
The seasons
The change of angle of shadows
The prevailing wind
The flight path of aeroplanes
The horizon and the voyage of ships
Images from aeroplanes
Images from space
The biggest and best proof is water level. Nothing else actually needs to be argued.
Did he though, religion is identical to science and space according to numbnuts.
All just stories
Tidal locking?Look it up. It's called Tidal Locking. I'd imagine there's lots of info out there about it.
It makes no sense for a centralised sun and an orbiting Earth and moon and all the rest of it. It literally doesn't.The only thing the Sun is in the centre of is the solar system. There is no reflective dome.
Which supposed planets are observed to be spinning globes?>Seems rather logical to assume that Earth might be a spinning globe given that the two nearest planets are observable to be spinning globes even through consumer-grade telescopes.
That's what you'd get with a dome and a central projector.No I mean if this huge energy source eminates from 1 large source, shines up and hits the dime then splits into millions of little dots all over the dome there would be an area of the sky with either a very very bright spot every night or no stars there, yet you can see stars over every inch of the sky
Any idea?Jesus wept.
No, not at all.Did he though, religion is identical to science and space according to numbnuts.
All just stories
Any idea?
Religion is nothing like science.
Religion is more akin to pseudo-science.
But we are told the moon rotates at about 10 mph aren't we?Absolutely yes, but you won't accept it, even though the short answer is SWINGBALL.
But we are told the moon rotates at about 10 mph aren't we?
Indeed. In both religion and pseudo-science, evidence against beliefs are denied regardless of how much proof there is.
It's not. Not one we walk upon or sail upon.Just like you with your "It's not a globe, it's not a globe, it's not a globe
, water level, water level, water level, la la la la la la not listening,
It's not a globe we walk upon or sail upon. Especially spinning.it's not a globe, it's not a globe" pseudo-scientific bollocks.
Then it can't be a swing ball effect if it rotates.It rotates at the same rate that it orbits, meaning it faces Earth all the way around, just like SWINGBALL.
But there is no proof for any of it.
It's not. Not one we walk upon or sail upon.
It's tehre right ion your face. Nothing to do with not listening.
It's not a globe we walk upon or sail upon. Especially spinning.
Then it can't be a swing ball effect if it rotates.
Ok I thought about it and still come to the same query.Think about that one a little longer and try again.
Nukehasslefan said:
Then it can't be a swing ball effect if it rotates.
Ok I thought about it and still come to the same query.
An yet still shows the same face all of the time.It rotates once with every orbit of the earth.
I think the purpose of all the reflections is to ensure the cell does not become stagnant. Basically to keep an energy to keep everything moving within to support the bacteria needed to keep the cell alive.If the moon is merely a reflection of the Sun then in your Dome world what is the purpose of the Moon?
@Nukehasslefan
An yet still shows the same face all of the time.
Any idea how this works?